Hit enter after type your search item

A “Brave New World”-perspective analysis on the subject of Hedonism.

/
/
/
26 Views

A “Brave New World”-viewpoint analysis on the topic of Hedonism.Imagine Brenda, a female who will not under any circumstances trade her life in order to be conditioned, and after that live as a Beta in the Brave New World (BNW ), universe. If this is the case, then Brenda could not consistently accept Hedonism. This is due to the definition of Hedonism, the amount and intensity of bodily enjoyment in Brave New World(BNW ), and the amount and intensity of bodily pleasure here in reality. The meaning of Hedonism leads one to take full advantage of the quantity of satisfaction and lessen the quantity of pain: The only thing inherently great in life is pleasure, and the only thing fundamentally bad in life is pain. Other things in life have extrinsic worth– they can cause either pain or pleasure, but do not produce the experiences by themselves. However, Hedonists are only interested in pleasure and pain, as these are the only intrinsic values. The unique aspect that figures out a better life from a worse one, is the amount of net enjoyment in one’s life. The net enjoyment is identified by subtracting the quantity of discomfort in one’s life from the amount of enjoyment. Notice that Hedonism just determines much better lives from worse ones, not good from bad. To make the distinction in between good and bad is an approximate decision and can not be determined through a similar medium such as net satisfaction. Quantitative Hedonism states that quantity and intensity are the only criteria that determine just how good a specific enjoyment is. If all pleasures vary only in quantity and duration, then the world in BNW is a dream for hedonists. One’s life in BNW is conditioned to be content and delighted with one’s, job, class in life, and the daily schedule of life. This schedule for one’s life never changes and so provides a maximum amount of enjoyment due to being happy and content. High satisfaction in BNW also comes from the open sexual relations in between individuals. Generally, it is encouraged from childhood to have as many sex partners as possible, therefore taking full advantage of the quantity of satisfaction from sex. The drug of choice in BNW is called Soma, and it delivers a fantastic feeling with no hangover impact like alcohol. This drug is dispersed daily at one’s work to maximize one’s quantity of body satisfaction. With all of these aspects improving enjoyment, it is also crucial to state that not much causes pain for one’s life in BNW. There are no individual relationships to cause discomfort, jobs and education are provided specifically for individuals, and life is very much prepared and repeated.

This repetition is what optimizes the amount and period of satisfaction in BNW lives. In real life, there does not exist anything like the above pointed out pleasures, in either quantity or period. Therefore, when comparing the net enjoyment of a life in BNW to a genuine earthly life, a hedonist discovers that BNW lives have a greater net satisfaction, and are thus far much better. This is since they in BNW have much more intrinsically excellent enjoyment, and much less disappointment and fundamentally bad events. So, if Brenda refuses to trade her life in order to be conditioned and live a BNW life, then she could not consistently accept hedonism since trading her life would provide her a higher net satisfaction, and by definition, a better life. Brenda still might accept hedonism if she accepted qualitative hedonism, based on Mill’s difference in between’greater ‘and ‘lower’enjoyments. According to Mill’s, particular pleasures have an unique higher value than other satisfaction. This can be due to a simple choice for one satisfaction over another, with the preferred pleasure having more intrinsic value since it is preferred,

and hence more net enjoyment. This can likewise be due choosing higher intellectual’ mind ‘enjoyments, as opposed to body satisfaction like those in BNW. Mill’s distinction goes hand in hand with qualitative hedonism, which adds quality to the criteria distinguishing enjoyment(strength and duration ). Greater quality pleasure are normally thought to be intellectual and innovative pleasures as compared to bestial pleasures. Intimate relationships can also be thought of as being a higher quality enjoyment. It is not substantial, however, that these greater pleasures merely exist– for a hedonist, these greater enjoyment should add to a higher net pleasure in life in order to be of value. Since there are absolutely no intellectual or intimate pleasures in BNW, the argument could be made that the intellectual and intimate enjoyments in real life offer higher net satisfaction, and therefore a much better life. This theory also takes into account the discomfort that may be caused by relationships or by not obtaining specific intellectual milestones. Nevertheless, the argument can be made that the satisfaction derived from these greater enjoyments far exceeds any pain triggered by them and ensures a greater net enjoyment than any life in BNW. If Brenda embraces this approach of thinking, then she could both accept hedonism and still not want to trade her life for a life in BNW. A qualitative hedonist, in order to consistently think that real life is better, must declare that the total net enjoyment one gets in reality is more than the net satisfaction one gets in the BNW universe. One need to claim that experiences in real life, including but not restricted to intellectual and intimate enjoyments, produce more net satisfaction than a life of bestial satisfaction in BNW. This consists of all of the discomfort and challenges experienced in reality, but not in BNW. The argument is that even with all of this discomfort, the net satisfaction is still higher in reality. This is also what Brenda should stick to if she wishes to not trade her real life for a conditioned BNW life.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar