Hit enter after type your search item

A Brave New World vs. 1984

/
/
/
19 Views

A Brave New World vs. 1984

A Brave New World vs. 1984 There are many resemblances and differences between Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984. With my analysis of both novels, I have come to the conclusion that they are not as alike as you would think. A Brave New World is a novel about the struggle of John,? the savage,’ who rejects the society of the Brave New World when and discovers that he could never ever be genuinely pleased there. 1984 is an unique about Winston, who finds prohibited love within a society that is not aloud to enjoy.

In both books the main character deals with his society and government to change, which winds up in disaster. Huxley wrote A Brave New World in 1931 in England. A Brave New World is an excellent demonstration of how the development of innovation could eventually result in downfall and a controlled society. In this consumer based society, the standard suitable of love and what recreation have long been neglected and despised, “Mother, monogamy, love. High spurts the fountain; fierce and foamy the wild jet.

The urge has however a single outlet” (Huxley 41). The comparison to a wild jet is meant to show the threats of these activities. A number of the Brave New World’s social norms are planned to “conserve” its people from anything unpleasant by denying them of the opportunity to experience feelings and to have their own morals and beliefs. The Brave New World’s society values, “Neighborhood, Identity, Stability,” (Huxley 1) are essential. Soma, the magical supreme drug is what keeps the population from revolting. What you need is a gramme of soma … All the advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their flaws” (page 15). The drug is crucial to the people of the society as it is expected to keep them from a few of the tougher elements of life, like disappointment and unhappiness. The drug is used as a type of entertainment, with individuals frequently taking? Soma Holidays,’ and its use is encouraged at any opportunity, particularly when excellent feelings, like sadness or love begin to occur.

The people of the society are conditioned to take the soma to calm them. The conditioning also keeps them from recognizing the risks of their society, and how their society operates by treating people like machines, organizing them into various classes that do different jobs, and even have different intellectual levels. In Brave New World, each class has a name. Alphas and Betas stay individuals; the Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons are typically oxygen deprived in the? womb’ and re the throws of society.

They do the grunt work that nobody else wishes to do, and have no awareness of how bad they really have it. Children begin their conditioning at a very young age, and their conditioning would be thought about cruel and uncommon in our society. “The yelling of the infants suddenly change the tone. There was something desperate, nearly crazy, about the sharp spasmodic yelps to which they now provided utterance” (Huxley 20). At a young age, the entire society is conditioned to stay away from extreme emotion, participate in casual sex, and take their soma.

In 1984, composed by George Orwell, the terrific party leader is the “Huge Sibling.” Big Sibling is much more associated with the society than the leader of the Brave New World, “Ford,” of Huxley’s book, called after the car manufacturer Henry Ford. The primary character Winston fears Big Bro and is a lot more aware of his society than any of the characters in A Brave New World who are constantly? calmed’ by soma. In A Brave New World the past is ignored entirely whereas in 1984 it is rewritten in order to match the present.

The 2 works significantly vary. A Brave New World is Huxley’s expression of a worry that humanity will produce an utopia by method of getting rid of whatever that makes life worth living. Orwell’s unique deals more with secrecy and paranoia. Huxley appears to feel that society is advancing toward a materialistic and superficial end, in which all things of real value, including the relationships which make people human, will be ruined. 1984 was composed as a warning versus the outcomes of having a totalitarian society.

Winston handles the consequences of his own mistakes, the criminal activity of uniqueness and controversy. “They were houses of the four Ministries between which the entire device of government was divided: the Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the arts; the Ministry of Peace, which worried itself with war; the Ministry of Love, which kept order; and the Ministry of Plenty, which was accountable for financial affairs. Their names in Newspeak: Minitrue, Minipax, Miniluv, and Miniplenty. (Orwell 8) Orwell’s unique shows issue about more aspects of life, where as in A Brave New World, the God (Ford) encourages production and consumerism to keep their society going, and to keep their residents uninformed. In conclusion, the novels do not ask whether societies with stability, pacification, and harmony can be produced, since they undoubtedly can be, but whether by doing this is a clever way to live. Too often individuals desire things that they can not have, and disappointment is the only logical end.

The characters of these 2 books advise us that is necessary to feel discomfort in order to feel pleasure, and it required to have issues in order to have solitions. that it is necessary to have pain to compare to delight, defeat to compare with triumph, and problems in order to have solutions. Both books end on unfavorable notes; Bernard is banished to work in Iceland and Winston goes through psychological treatment and then eliminated. Bibliography 1. Huxley, Aldous. A Brave New World. 81932, 1946 Aldous Huxley. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. NY, NY. 10022. 2. Orwell, George 1984. 81949 Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar