Hit enter after type your search item

A Rose for Emily Reaction Paper


A Rose for Emily Response Paper

A r A Rose for Emily Kristina Linseisen-Snead ENG/125 September 26, 2011 Rocquie O’Rourke A Rose for Emily The first short story released by William Faulkner (1930, 1897-1962), A Rose for Emily, welcomes the reader into the dark and oftentimes psychopathic world of Emily Grierson. The Southern Gothic story takes the reader on a changing journey along with the primary character from a sweet and innocent girl to a mental-ill spinster. The main character Emily was when a brilliant and appealing young girl who becomes a strange eccentric recluse, and a focus of obsession in the town.

Emily might fall far from grace but never ever quits on living life on her own terms. She in some way preserves her old southern customs, withstanding modification and the coming to age of a brand-new south brought on with a new generation. It is not till the death of Emily and the end of the story that the reader comes to know just how far the heroin has fallen. The story “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner uses several methods such as paradox, significance and, narration to communicate the story. The author uses irony to set the tone for the story early. The irony in the story starts with the title, “A Rose for Emily. A rose is a beautiful flower with a pointy, which can be agonizing, stem with thorns. The title represents the beautiful flower and the story represents the sharp thorns. A rose is something one may bring to the funeral of a stunning woman, here this story starts. The paradox lies in that Miss Emily is never brought roses however continues to get thorns throughout her life. These thorns consist of the health problem and death of her dad and the null opportunities of a correct suitor. In action to these scenarios she develops here own thorns against life.

The thorns created by Miss Emily do not come to light up until after her death, when the body of impossible fan is uncovered, which, “as soon as lain in the mindset of a welcome.” (Faulkner, 1930, p. 710) The paradox in the story contributes to the tone and assists create the sense of disaster and pity the reader is left felling for the character. Meaning is used throughout the story in different methods to strengthen meaning and offer enrichment to the story. The reader needs to be open and ready to think deeply about life and experience to see the bigger, concealed meaning of importance utilized.

Symbolism is used in the setting of the story. Your home that Emily resided in for so long functions as an analog to Emily herself, “raising its persistent and coquettish decay” alone and apart from society. The description of the house is not just about the house alone, however an accurate description of Emily and the method Emily has concerned live her life. The description to your home also signifies the style of social and culture dispute. Meaning is likewise utilized to explain the character in the story. The unidentified storyteller of the story describes Emily as a “fallen monument” (Faulkner, 1930, p. 01) and her appearances in the windows of her house appearing like a “carven upper body of an idol in a specific niche” (Faulkner, 1930, p. 703) supply her function as an icon in the past. The importance utilized in the story develops descriptions that the reader will not soon forget, hence adding to the impact and presence of the story. Every story has a teller, a storyteller; the narrative of the story impacts the telling of the story and how the reader protects the story. The narration of the story had a huge effect on the telling of the story.

The reader is not sure who the storyteller is or what their interest is in the topic of Emily. The person telling this story is an observer of the story. It is unclear what side the narrator is on when it is specified that, “We did not say she was crazy then … she would need to hold on to that which had robbed her, as individuals will.” (Faulkner, 1930, p. 703) The narrator protects Emily and speaks out versus her way of life. The individual telling the story presumes to be talking on behalf of the entire town. It nearly appears as the town itself is speaking and informing the story as it has occurred over the years.

This is apparent when it is stated, “our entire town went to her funeral service” (Faulkner, 1930, p. 701) and the repeated use of “we.” Through making use of narration, Faulkner has the ability to make reader fell as, though they are a part of the story being informed. A Rose for Emily, by William Faulkner, highlights what can occur when the clock progresses but time does not. Emily Grierson is seen as the victim in this story due to the fact that it in some way appears that she was unable to fulfill her capacity and find her location in the world.

Hence the town takes pity on her. In the end the reader is also in some way obliged to have pity for Emily despite the fact that the reader grossly disturbed by her habits. By using irony, importance, and narration, Faulkner is able to direct the readers’ response away from a grotesque and morbid story to an effective story of compassion. Reference Faulkner, W. (1930 ). A Rose for Emily. (pp. 701-710) Barnet, S., Burto, W.,; Cain, W. (2011 ). Literature for composition: Essays, stories, poems, and plays (8th ed. ). Boston, MA: Longman.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar