Analysis of Language, Rhetoric, and Politics in George Orwell’s 1984
“WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, LACK OF KNOWLEDGE IS STRENGTH”
This declaration coming from the novel entitled Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell includes different meanings depending upon its context and rationality. The expression “war is peace” can be define as a forecast or conclusion that peace is constantly an outcome of war. When there is war, there would be peace, which is not constantly true depends on the circumstance.
The expression “freedom is slavery” can be stated that even if you are totally free, there are influences, effects, and factors that would continue the act of slavery and individuals would still experience these cases. Since when we say liberty, there would be a type of governance and democracy but as long as authority exists, slavery would still become part of freedom.
The phrase “lack of knowledge is strength” can be true in some cases. If you are ignorant, you are more efficient in acting without losing anything due to the fact that you do not know something. Lack of knowledge can be said as an escape to do whatever without understanding anything– just to be free. However, why do these expressions were specified if they might really say what holds true and proper with no unclear, ambiguous, and doublespeak words or languages.
Usage of languages can be vague and ambiguous depending upon the person who utilized it, on the context he is relating with, individuals he is speaking to and the meaning of those words itself. Most often, we utilize words that are light however crucial in order to make our audience or the individual we are talking with will be less strained by the whole situation.
We utilize fuzzy, complicated and light words to exhibit the significance of what we need to state in accordance to their feelings. Among the practical or easiest examples is the words or languages in organisation. A corporation needs to decrease its employees due to company problems, but rather than using sincere words– they made use of technical words in order to make their staff members understand the scenarios (not the genuine reason) without any difficult sensations or a minimum of minimal objection originating from the staff members.
One business rejected it was laying off 500 people. “We don’t characterize it as a layoff,” stated the business spin physician. “We’re handling our personnel resources. Often you manage them up, and often you handle them down.” Firing employees is such industry that there are business whose organisation is helping other companies fire employees by providing “termination and outplacement consulting” for corporations associated with “reduction activities.” However don’t fret, if you’re “managed down,” the “Outplacement Consultant” will assist you with “re-employment engineering.” (Lutz, 1996)
Due to the fact that of these circumstances, people became clueless instead of being educated that are actually required in every element of human life. In order to become productive, we require to be sophisticated by the reality that we need to comprehend things that are linked to our jobs, sociological interaction, and even individual maters.
Nevertheless, there are circumstances when these aspects of understanding and education could not be obtained due to the fact that people behind those conflicts and issues are collared by their actions. Therefore, it is a form of taking– taking our learning, understanding, and opportunity to recognize sensitive matters. That is why individuals having these problems are playing-safe to get less rejection or conflicts in the future however the effects will be more troublesome.
Then, a concern will increase towards these issues as it become more active during these times. The question will be what are the premises of these individuals to state unclear, unclear, and doublespeak that are more conflicting rather than honest ideas? I think, the reason these things occurred is that individuals are naturally phony in different kinds and premises as also based on the article of Stephanie Ericsson entitled, The Ways We Lie. Why do they require to do these? It is since they need to compel people that there is no issue or everything is all best to degree of lying just to make things better.
We lie. All of us do. We reduce, we avoid conflict, we spare people’s sensations, we conveniently forget, we conceal, we justify lying to the huge- guy situations. (Ericsson, 1992)
This declaration reveals that we all lie in various scenarios specifically when it is needed or often we used words that are less offending to minimize the response of our audience or who we are talking with. In this case, as linked to the phrases above, use of doublespeak, vague, or ambiguous words are currently part of our sociological interaction. We are doing this in order to make individuals less unbiased to the entire situation. Nevertheless, we can not reject the reality that it will soon emerged into a clashing problems that needs to be carried out in accordance to the law.
Originating from the novel Nineteen Eighty-four by Orwell the declaration “robbing its residents of their capacity for important thought and affordable, authentic self-expression” holds true not just from the past however likewise in the present and will still exists in the future. It is a fear we too, in our modern-day society, need to share, or argue that his worry is exaggerated and even unfounded.
Due to the fact that of the cases that were discussed above, people might not be able to reveal themselves since hey are ending up being oblivious to what holds true and best. I can state that it is much better to recognize the fact despite of the failure that it might trigger rather than doing some actions and hoping that there would be a brighter future but actually, there would be no service to the issue is more unpleasant.
Our political, social, economic, and even personal aspects of living have lots of doublespeak words and languages. This is since we are not constantly open up to reality and reality for we do not wish to be rejected, bound, and failure. Frequently, we keep on hiding from our blankets to leave from the certainty of whatever. That is why, in order to lessen these cases, people are already doing lower forecasts to decrease ridiculous feelings that might cause tension and anguish.
However, does political aspect needs these cases to magnify the concerns of the future. Realistically, we know that political cases and elements ought to be truthful when it concerns its decision, preferences, and problems because its residents are the main impacted from all of it. However, this is not the circumstance today.
There are some situations or perhaps almost bothersome circumstances that are concealed from the knowledge of the people for it will bring dreadful conflict to the nation. If the government could not manage the situation and people knew about it, the president or the leader will discuss however it will utilize doublespeak words or languages to make the people more comfortable and to lessen their shock, but as much as what extent? Things like these taken place after the September 11, 2001 attack in New york city.
The president claim that the nation is already safe from terror attacks but he did not mention any problem after the fear attack. He used doublespeak words to make its people less scared from the whole circumstance but he did not say anything about the defenseless cases and problem within the white home that the terrorists already cautioned them but they did not pay attention to it. In this case, they did not wish to be blamed so they made some segues and concentrated on the future having no further validations of the past and the present.
In our time, it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not real, it will generally be discovered that the author is some sort of rebel, expressing his private opinions and not a “celebration line.” Orthodoxy, of whatever color, appears to require a lifeless, imitative design. The political dialects to be discovered in pamphlets, leading short articles, manifestoes, White papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, obviously, differ from celebration to celebration, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, brilliant, homemade turn of speech. (Orwell, 1946)
As a whole, Orwell’s book is a discovery of the past situations that still exists today. Language is not an issue but individuals who used the language based on their intentions and desire. If they choose not to be obliged and responsible to the problem, they will utilize doublespeak words, but if we consider it, who will be accountable for all of those problems if no one is truthful about everything? Is it the future generation, or our ancestors?
Ericsson, Stephanie. “The Ways We Lie.” 1992. 4 Dec. 2005