Hit enter after type your search item

Antigone and A Midsummer Night’s Dream: Comparison of Juxtaposing Antagonists


The success of the narrative arc of both Sophocles’ disaster Antigone and Shakespeare’s funny A Midsummer Evening’s Dream greatly rely on personality communications with the natural world. In each play respectively, the protagonists should objective and negotiate elements of nature to achieve their certain objective. The plot of Antigone focuses on returning the body of Polynices to the environment through a ritualistic funeral procedure. In a similar way, A Midsummer Night’s Desire entails an essential pastoral getaway to nature in order to resolve matters of unrequited, linked relationship. Since the environment considerably impedes the development of the lead characters’ success of goal in both dramatization, this dispute is stressed as the central antagonistic force both in A Midsummer Evening’s Dream as well as Antigone. In Shakespeare’s traditional pastoral play, a character versus environment dispute is highlighted for the major human protagonists. Thus, the environment is plainly indicated to be the main antagonist in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Most notably, the human enthusiasts’ central goals of romantically connecting with various other details personalities are inevitably delayed by a very particular natural element. Lysander, among the lovers, specifies his primary objective within the fan’s initial scene in the woodland. He tells Hermia that he wishes that they come to be “Two bosoms interchained with an oath” (II.ii.49). The realization of this objective is entirely avoided by the disturbance of an effective “little Western blossom”, which is vested with the professors to “make man or woman crazily dote/Upon the following online creature that it sees” (II.i.164-172). Rather than allowing Lysander and Hermia’s love for each and every various other to proceed undisturbed (and also hence accomplish Lysander’s objective), this natural element conflicts directly with the amorous schedule of Lysander by making him lustfully pursue Helena, that Lysander (post interference of nature) now considers to be “the better house maid” (II.ii.116). In the same manner, the flower directly disrupts the goal Hermia has adamantly defended given that the beginning of the play: having the ability to enjoy Lysander, regardless of being betrothed to Demetrius by her dad. This certain component of the environment verifies to be a similarly hostile pressure in Demetrius’ capacity to attain his goal in the play. In addition to his need to marry Hermia, Demetrius’ central purpose in the story is perhaps to run away the sickening love of Helena (II.i.212). He consistently makes this objective clear by intimidating Helena with “the mercy of wild beasts” and “mischief in the wood” ought to she continue to passionately pursue him (II.i.228, 237). It coincides Western blossom that creates Demetrius to desert his plainly established objective, and at some point act upon the complete opposite. Since a natural element directly triggers this elimination as well as turnaround of self-agency in a significant character choice, it is clear that nature is also a hostile pressure in the specific narrative of Demetrius. Puck, the character that initiates the hostile get in touch with between natural environment and also human character, can not be taken into consideration a villain due to the removal of intentionality from his actions. Before leaving to implement the flower-human interaction, Puck clears up that he is exclusively executing these activities as the servant of Oberon (II.i.268). In stating this, Puck removes himself from the ramifications of his disturbance, and transfers the consequences of his activities to the fairy king. Therefore of adding to the enmity of the fans, Oberon symbolically becomes part of the environment. This assimilation of character right into the fiber of the environment is supported by the Workshop Theater’s production of A Midsummer Evening’s Dream. The outfit layout of Alison Yanota actively garments the actor playing Oberon (Stuart McDougall) in a garment composed virtually completely of fragments of wood as well as earth-toned textile to communicate that Oberon is efficiently part of the environment that annoys the lovers. The enemy force of nature comes to be the central villain of the play since the lovers are the central protagonists of the story. Of the teams of characters in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, the lover’s needs to overcome one of the most vicissitude in order to attain happiness. Thus, their many problems make up a majority of the narrative body of the play. In addition, the enthusiasts are probably the most relatable characters that talk with the human experience. Because of this, the audience can viscerally as well as a lot more tangibly associate with their story, which enhances their narrative with an unique value. Since the environment directly hinders the enthusiast’s gratification of personality objectives, as well as there is no personality that straight assumes the role of villain, nature has to be taken into consideration the primary hostile pressure for these characters, and by virtue of this association, the environment comes to be the central hostile pressure in the entirety of the play. The problem structure of Sophocles’ legend Antigone complies with a comparable pattern. The environment is created as a comparatively damned force that presumes the central antagonistic role within the play. Antigone, definitely the protagonist of the text, clearly mentions her narrative objective beforehand in the very first act. She plans to “load a pile of planet over [her] bro” despite King Creon specifically prohibiting this action (Sophocles, 128). This stated objective is additional made clear when sustained by historic evidence. In a short article regarding fatality and the afterlife in Old Greece, the Metropolitan Gallery of Art of New york city City specifies that:

Old literary resources highlight the need of a proper funeral [for one to progress to the immortality] and describe the noninclusion of funeral rites as an insult to human self-respect (Iliad, 23.71). Loved ones of the departed, mainly females, conducted the sophisticated burial rituals … (The Met, 1)

When sustained by this contextual evidence, it is clear that Antigone’s central purpose is to allow her sibling, Polynices, to progress to the immortality through appropriate funeral in the earth. It is the achievement of this purpose that is totally impeded by the disturbance of the environment. Nature is clearly vested with the authority to give Polynices post-mortem bliss in the immortality, however forbids the complete completion of this process a number of times. After Antigone hides the body of her sibling the first time, the sentry, following Creon’s orders, “swept all the earth that covered the body” (137 ). Hereafter activity, Antigone is compelled to repeat the entire burial activity again, which gets her caught by the Sentry, and ultimately finishes in her penalty and also fatality by King Creon (138 ). It is via this action that nature prevents the accomplishment of Antigone’s main goal, in addition to incites the stress of a contagonistic pressure to emulate the protagonist personality of the dramatization. Due to ins and out of an appropriate funeral which nature demands in permitting Polynices to proceed to the afterlife, Antigone’s goal in the play is never ever totally realized as a result of the moment and specificity nature needs in finishing this process. Antigone’s aggravation with this repeated process (and also therefore the natural world) is told through the Sentry’s words when he tells that upon discovering Polynice’s body revealed, Antigone is caught “yelling like an angry bird/When it locates its nest left vacant as well as kids gone” (137 ). Right here, Antigone explicitly reveals her vexation with all-natural forces in the rejection of her achievement of purpose. Antigone’s battle with nature also incites a different pseudo-conflict with King Creon, furthering the idea that the main problem within the play is nature versus character. Dramatica’s Theory of a Tale defines a contagonistic personality as one that “functions to place obstacles in the course of the lead character, and also to draw it far from success” (Dramatica, ch. 3). If Antigone’s main aspiration is to attain the proper funeral of her brother, after that King Creon is exclusively a contagonistic pressure that helps the central antagonistic environment to prevent Antigone’s progression. Creon does so by punishing Antigone to die in a “rock rose burial place”, hence eliminating Antigone’s company to achieve her objective (Sophocles, 150). Nonetheless, a natural element (the “rock vaulted tomb”) is still the force that literally prevents Antigone from seeking the funeral of Polynices for a 3rd time and also ultimately brings about her death, signifying the success of antagonist over lead character. It is also important to keep in mind the duplicated adverse connotations of nature by various other personalities in this text, as the Sentry shows over. For example, King Creon, when charging Ismene of joining the burial of Polynices, calls her a “creeping viper” (140 ). In a similar way, the chorus, when describing the divided family of King Creon, compares it to the “uneasy surge of the sea” as well as the consuming power of fire (143 ). Finally, Antigone, when defining her fate, compares herself to a Phrygian house maid who was locked up in a style “ruthless as the ivy”, while the “rain and snow/Beat down upon her” (148 ). Taken with each other, the repeated repudiation of a lead character’s goal by natural environments, the symbolic fatality of Antigone while restricted by natural environments, as well as the leitmotif of the negative organizations of nature cumulatively create nature as a vilified, central villain in this play-text.

Both A Midsummer Evening’s Desire as well as Antigone count on the natural world to provide antagonistic pressures for the lead characters of each respective story. In Shakespeare’s infallible comedy, nature removes character company, hinders the ability to accomplish plainly defined objectives, and also encompasses the various other opponents of the fan characters, that are the main lead characters of the piece. In Sophocles’ version tragedy, the natural world stops the central character from attaining her clearly developed narrative goal, creates a character versus personality pseudo-conflict via this very same rejection, as well as is consistently identified adversely by a variety of the text’s characters. In these ways, both messages use the same intangible main antagonist: the environment.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar