Hit enter after type your search item

Calvinistic Beliefs in Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown”


“‘My Faith is gone!'” (Hawthorne 394) sobs Young Goodman Brown after seeing his wife’s pink ribbon fall from the sky and after that recognizing that humanity is depraved. Although Faith is the name of Brown’s partner, it is likewise a metaphor for his interior faith in God. In “Young Goodman Brown,” Puritan attitudes towards faith and evil are carefully thought about by Hawthorne and explained at various levels of depth in the story. Numerous critics have difficulty selecting the total theme of this story, though, and there is a blended action towards the intentions for Hawthorne’s writing of this piece. When taking a look at Puritan theology and the historical context of the narrative, “Young Goodman Brown” is changed into a number of ethical lessons based on the value of faith which, in turn, supports Calvinistic beliefs.

The story of Goodman Brown consists of numerous references to biblical stories and Puritanical beliefs. Although Brown believes he is an upstanding person of a respectable family line, he allows his interest to betray his faith. Brown gets here late to his meeting with the wicked figure and discusses that, “‘Faith kept me back a while'”(Hawthorne 388). Brown hesitates since he realizes that his journey with this devilish being is wicked. This story parallels the scriptural story of Adam and Eve and the fall of guy. Although the set knew it was against the orders of God to eat the fruit from the tree of wisdom, Satan lured them into committing wicked acts. This single act decides the fate for the future of humanity as sinful beings, but this was not the only outcome in the eyes of the Puritans: “the Puritan version [of the fall of guy] goes farther still. Not just human nature however all nature suffered the following catastrophe … What surrounds us, what we look upon and commune with, its not nature as it issued from the hand of God. It is nature red in tooth and claw, perverted from its initial, the domain of the Prince of Evil and of his subject, natural male” (Jones 277). Hawthorne includes both of these Puritanical beliefs into his story: he develops a paranoid beast from the once innocent Goodman Brown and the natural setting regresses into a risky, unknown forest of evil. Brown describes the fearful nature of the wilderness after announcing his faith is gone: “The whole forest was peopled with shocking noises– the creaking of the trees, the howling of the wild beasts, and the shout of Indians” (Hawthorne 395). Although Goodman Brown was confident when entering into the forest with the devilish being, his temptations trigger him to despair and end up being not sure of humanity and nature. Although this requirement for expedition might be viewed as a critique of the self-important nature of the Puritans, Hawthorne includes a similar moral lesson as the scriptural story, in which interest is penalized and faith is the escape from evil.

Additionally, Hawthorne’s use of language in describing Goodman Brown’s journey into the forest shows Puritanical speeches. Although his trip into the forest is an act of curiosity and exploration, Brown explains it as an “errand” on numerous accounts. For example, when Brown goes over leaving Faith, he states, “‘What a scalawag am I to leave her on such an errand!” (Hawthorne 388). By making use of wordplay, Brown tries to develop a martyr out of himself, in efforts to conquer the wicked presented by the devil. He acts as if he should leave his spiritual faith and experience evil before being able to end up being totally faithful to God. The word “errand” has historic background in the Puritanical setting: “Suffice it to say that Young Goodman Brown’s ‘errand’ into the wilderness remembers the Puritans’ ‘Errand into the Wilderness,’ a metaphor first proclaimed in Samuel Danforth’s election preaching of Matt 11, 1670 … [Hawthorne] likewise integrates the root of the Puritans’ identity and business: their self-remarked likeness to the children of Israel in the wilderness” (Christophersen 203). This likewise shows a certain mocking of the contradictory nature of Puritan perfects, due to the fact that Hawthorne makes use of the hypocrisy of his main character; on the other hand, Hawthorne is supporting the requirement of faith when participating in an unknown territory. As would be the concerns of Puritans who plan to settle in numerous brand-new locations, Hawthorne talks about the value of preserving a religious stability in order to overcome evil. Sadly when it comes to Goodman Brown, he abandons his faith before entering into the wilderness, leaving him prone to the Devil and his wicked followers. Therefore, after experiencing the evils of nature and the unidentified, Brown returns to civilization as a lost man who is not able to preserve a firm religious stance.

Hawthorne discusses this lost nature of male in relation to Calvinistic belief too. As Goodman Brown enters the unknown forest, he thinks that his brainpowers to overcome evil will protect him. When he abandons his faith, he is trying to overcome the Devil through his own mental stability and strength. His belief in himself represents a very various Puritanical belief: “For all insistence on man’s unworthiness, his corrupt nature, male still bears the image of God in some procedure engraven on him. He is for that reason, says Calvin, however doing not have in intrinsic benefit, a creature of no little self-respect and excellence” (Jones 277). Brown’s self-respect is detailed plainly by Hawthorne through his effort to conquer evil without the help of his faith. Sadly, as the reader observes, Brown’s will power and respectability is not sufficient adequate to beat the Devil’s temptations; rather, Brown victimizes himself by abandoning his faith and participating in unknown area. After his experiences in the forest, Hawthorne describes Brown as, “A stern, a sad, a darkly meditative, a distrustful, if not a desperate guy …”(Hawthorne 399). Goodman Brown becomes lost due to his self-assurance and dignity and due to his desertion of faith.

The nature of male continues to be questioned when Goodman Brown experiences total depravity in the forest. He is witness to effective and spiritual figures from his society participating in various types of devil praise and witchcraft. Brown’s shock and horror of seeing those he appreciates as active members of this wicked cause him to question his own purity: “Goodman Brown stepped forth from the shadow of the trees and approached the parish, with whom he felt a loathful brotherhood by the compassion of all that was wicked in his heart” (Hawthorne 397). Although he thought he had the mental ability to conquer the Devil, Brown signs up with the crowd due to the innately evil nature of humans. Corresponding to the fall of guy parallel in the beginning of the story, Brown finishes the final stages of his temptation into wicked by damaging his faith: “What [Brown] perceives remains in reality the nature of man: he is not mistaken. But since he considers it without the stepping in medium of faith, his merely human eyes can see no reality beyond it” (Jones 279-280). This resembles the Puritanical idea of predestination. Although humanity may appear to be faithful beings or upstanding residents, their fate may be among wicked and destruction. As Brown experiences wickedness without the help of his faith, his fate is chosen for him since he completely loses his grasp of God: “His ramification is that the doctrine of the elect and damned is not a faith which carries male heavenward on its skirts, as Brown as soon as believed, but, instead, condemns him to hell– bad and great alike indiscriminately– and for all intents and functions so few escape regarding make on male’s possibility of redemption practically disappear” (Connolly 375). Brown’s prearranged experiences with evil has triggered him to lose his sense of reality and faith and eventually leads him to damnation. By witnessing the real nature of man without the aid of his faith, Brown’s own nature turns to one of evil.

This balance of wicked and faith has been questioned by several critics that attempt to find a thematic unity within the text. For example, Connolly thinks that, “not just did [Brown] keep his faith but throughout his dreadful experience he actually discovered the complete and frightening significance of his faith” (371 ). Although Hawthorne describes the significance of faith in information, Brown’s journey is a regression from the confident, religious being he when was into a distrustful, weak male. While he did discover the truth of predestination and guy from a religious stance, his desertion of faith causes him to become a victim to the evil he experiences. Connolly stops working to resolve the problems of Brown’s faith before participating in the forest and its sluggish decline throughout his journey. From the Puritanical perspective, Brown’s mistake is deserting his faith in order to conquer the evils of his society and of the world. His journey represents the scriptural fall of male, which the Puritans thought was the source of all male’s sin.

Although critics have disagreed on the motives of Hawthorne’s writing of “Young Goodman Brown,” from a historic point of view, the story represents the Calvinistic beliefs common throughout that time. While Hawthorne may have intended on attacking the self-important and contradictory nature of the Puritans, Goodman Brown is a character that exemplifies the moral corruption triggered by a loss of faith. Through several scriptural parallels and Puritanical beliefs, Hawthorne illustrates that faith is the only security from the evils of the world which by exploring the world without religious faith, humankind is prone to depravity.

Works Pointed out

Christophersen, Expense. “‘Young Goodman Brown’ as Historical Allegory: A Lexical Link.” Research Studies simply put Fiction 23.2 (1986 ):202 -204.

Connolly, Thomas E. “Hawthorne’s ‘Young Goodman Brown’: An Attack on Puritanic Calvinism.” American Literature 28.3 (1956 ): 370-375.

Hawthorne, Nathaniel. “Young Goodman Brown.” A Handbook of Vital Approaches to Literature. Ed. Wilfred L. Guerin, et al. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005. 387-400.

Jones, Madison. “Variations on a Hawthorne Style.” Studies simply put Fiction 15.3 (1978 ): 277-283.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar