Fahrenheit 451 Contrast Essay
Fahrenheit 451 Ray Bradbury’s Forecast of the Future TREVOR YOUNG Fahrenheit 451 is a dystopian unique composed by Ray Bradbury that illustrates a futuristic American society where books are banned and independent idea is maltreated. Bradbury utilizes his creativity to take a tough look at a world consumed by technology, and he provides predictions about pleasure, violence and anti-intellectualism that are amazingly comparable to the contemporary American society. Notably, in both societies people find pleasure in entertainment that is constantly preoccupying. Second, individuals are violent and negligent.
Finally, anti-intellectualism and suppression of independent idea affect both societies, as firefighters ban books in Fahrenheit 451 and, in the contemporary society, authorities ban books that do not align with their moral and religions. There are numerous relations in between the society portrayed in Fahrenheit 451 and the modern-day American society, initially of which is the way people accomplish happiness. Firstly, Bradbury precisely illustrates the future with media bombarding individuals’s lives. In Fahrenheit 451, rather of little black and white tvs, characters reside in rooms called “TELEVISION parlours. In these TELEVISION parlours, the whole walls are plated with massive flat screen tvs, sending out quickly images with intense colours and loud sounds. These TV parlours take in the characters’ lives and sidetrack them from reality. In one scene, Montag is trying to acquire his better half’s attention, yet she avoids him by stating she is preoccupied with her digital family on the TV program. For instance, “”Will you turn the parlour off?” he asked. “That’s my household. “” (Bradbury, Page 48) This reveals that media in the novel obscures individuals’s point of view of reality.
Later in the unique, Montag claims that if his better half would pass away, he would not sob of her death, however cry because he would not cry of her death. Other characters likewise say this, showing that families in Fahrenheit 451 are not attached through sensations, however merely a mutual contract to marriage. It is somewhat funny to think someone could be so obscured by media to say the characters in a tv program are their family, while ignoring their genuine family members. However, people in contemporary society display similar behaviours. Soap operas such as “As The World Turns” have become the focus point for countless people in today’s society.
They prepare their lives around this hour long sector of their day, and speak of the characters within the program as if they are next door neighbours or perhaps part of their own family. Often, people even speak with the characters as if they can hear them, or shout lines prior to the character really does. This behaviour, influenced by mass media, exists in both Fahrenheit 451 and today’s society. Second, Fahrenheit 451 portrays an excessively violent society that is terribly similar to modern-day America. Kids go to the “Fun Park” where they have a good time screaming loudly, breaking windows and combating each other.
To let out their anger, adults drive their beetle mobiles exceptionally quick and run over small animals such as bunnies and squirrels. Clarisse, a castaway in the unique, discusses this violence from a 3rd individual point of view, “I hesitate of children my own age. They kill each other. Did it always used to be that way? My uncle states no. 6 of my good friends have been shot in the last year alone. 10 of them died in vehicle wrecks. I hesitate of them and they don’t like me due to the fact that I hesitate. My uncle states his grandpa kept in mind when children didn’t eliminate each other. But that was a very long time ago when they had things different. (Bradbury, Page 30) Considering That Clarisse is an outsider in the unique, she is able to go back from the norm and examine it from a various point of view. In this quote, she explains the violence of the other children and how they use it as an outlet. In Fahrenheit 451, individuals convince themselves they more than happy, but clearly are not due to the fact that they have violent behaviours. This yearning for violence marks the dissatisfaction of the general populated. The “Enjoyable Park” and the style of violence in Fahrenheit 451 are really comparable to a yearly contest presently kept in Albany, New York City.
It is an arranged occasion where kids use various types of weapons to shoot and kill as numerous squirrels as they can within a certain time. The kid with the heaviest bag of squirrels wins. Grownups say this is a great method for kids to let out their anger and get closer to nature (1 ). Modern American society clearly offers examples that are simply as brainwashed and idiotic as exhibited by the individuals of Fahrenheit 451’s society. Lastly, throughout the novel Bradbury provides a dispute in between lack of knowledge and understanding.
The basic society is being numbed into believing that understanding makes people disagree with each other and unhappy. To avoid individuals from reading and getting understanding, the firefighters burn all books. By committing these actions, they are promoting sameness and ignorance, to supposedly preserve happiness among society. Captain Beatty discusses the history of firefighters to Montag, speaking of their society’s view of equality. “We must all be alike. Not everyone born totally free and equal, as the constitution says, but everybody made equivalent … A book is a crammed gun in your home next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach guy’s mind. (Bradbury, page 58) Captain Beatty is hinting that books motivate individuals to question authority and think of why things are done the method they are done. Throughout the years, numerous books have actually been prohibited from schools and libraries in the United States (2 ). Classics such as To Kill a Mockingbird obstacle society’s hypocrisy and question why laws protect some people and not other, when the American constitution states “all males are equal.” The goal of burning or banning books is to restrict individuals’s access to different views, and some validate it keeps harmony within a society, however truly it keeps the authority’s control of individuals.
This act of anti-intellectualism through suppression of understanding exists in both Fahrenheit 451 and modern American society. It is chilling to see the variety of examples which reveal that today’s society is similar to the society portrayed in Fahrenheit 451. In both societies, individuals are brainwashed by watching tv all day long and disregarding reality and nature. Individuals reveal violent behaviours and are inconsiderate to other’s sensations and insensitive of the impact of their actions. Last but not least, authorities in both societies promote lack of knowledge through suppression of understanding.
Bradbury’s book is as relevant of a warning today as it was when it was composed in the 1950s. Bibliography 1. Short, Aaron. “Squirrel Nut Clippers: Pol Annoyed At Varmint Searching Contest.” City State Squirrel Nut Clippers Pol Outraged At Varmint Searching Contest Comments. City; State, 8 Feb. 2013. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. http://www. cityandstateny. com/squirrel-nut-clippers/ 2. Kelly, Melissa. “Top 10 Banned Books.” About. com Secondary Education. About. com, n. d. Web. 14 Apr. 2013.; http://712educators. about. com/od/bannedbooks/ tp/banned _ books. htm