Hit enter after type your search item

Fahrenheit 451 vs. 1984

/
/
/
7 Views

Fahrenheit 451 vs. 1984

Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 are 2 different books with a great deal of resemblances and although written years ago, can still be applicable to the world today. A number of clashing frames of mind have actually played defining functions in forming mankind throughout the twentieth century. Visions of a bright future held by mankind were made the most of by the pledge of a much better life through the sacrifice of individuality to the state. The trickery and the treachery by both judgment government shows their resemblances in their overbearing control and this is extremely apparent in both books.

The books 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury established the atmosphere of the government control over everything the citizens do– even in what they believe. Worry of the effects of acting in the non-prescribed method is revealed through the protagonists, who were the few people in each novel to eventually find the light and what makes up as a good life, only for it to be their biggest defect. A single character is pushed away since of his inability to adhere and accept the laws of society. The comparable fear of the abuse of power and technology of the state at the cost of human uniqueness, core worths and so on feel bitter within these books talks to the significance of these books within their historical context and their effectiveness for awakening individuals to the horrendous consequences of their lack of knowledge. Cautions of what society could possibly degenerate to are provided in 1984 by George Orwell and in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. Both novels contain vivid dystopian worlds from which we can see strong similarities to our present societies and that is the threats of a controlled federal government and how visible this control is in both novels.

The governments in books Big Sibling and The Celebration in 1984 and The Firemen in Fahrenheit 451 have dominant control over their people and they have a lot of resemblances in their ways of controlling. Their desire for a growing number of power is a brilliant example of control in the books. In 1984, this can be seen throughout the novel as the federal government attempts to eliminate whatever pleasurable. According to the ruling celebration, they attempt to develop a dystopian society where even sex is simply a rule and not for pleasure. But in the future there will be no spouses and no pals.

Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be gotten rid of. Procreation will be an annual rule like the renewal of a provision card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are mat work upon it now. (Orwell 267) In the novel Fahrenheit 451 the main battle for power deals with the government. This overly oppressive, practically Orwellian design bureaucracy attempts to make sure there is no interaction with books at all. They think that books penetrate their society and corrupt the minds of the people.

Unannounced searches of home by “Firemen” are not at all unusual. At the smallest inkling of this futuristic contraband, these firemen will search through all of one’s property, at times, destroying whatever in their path. On the opposite side of that spectrum, there is a battle for power by the individuals too. There is the woman who concealed several thousand volumes of books in her house. She likes these books a lot that when the firemen raided her home, she went down with the books without doubt. She did not care what they were going to do to her.

Another example of the similarities is the aspects utilized for control in both books. In 1984, there were a lot of aspects utilized. Telescreens for example was a very important component in the play. There was a telescreen in every house and the ‘proles’ might not put it off. It might see everybody and everything and it was put there simply to view individuals and also reprimand or in ‘Newspeak’ vaporize them of any bad actions towards the government. “Winston kept his back to the telescreen. It was much safer; but as he understood, even a back can be exposing” (Orwell 3).

This remark just goes as far to tell the audience the degree to which fear was inputted into everybody in the play simply in an attempt to maintain their control in this ‘dystopian’ society. In Fahrenheit 451, they are fire fighters however instead, they set fire on books and homes that have books. Aspect of control can plainly be seen there as they do not desire people checking out books as they believe it just damages the mind and according to Beatty the head of the fire department, it constantly outrages some people. “While the book went sparkling whirls and blew away on a wind turned dark with burning” (Bradbury 3-4).

Control is one of the significant themes in the novels 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 and it is primarily showcased on the government. The resident’s ignorance in both books and how the governments cultivates that by making them feel everything was okay and consequently tricking them into dealing with reality. In Fahrenheit 451, whatever that the government motivates the people to do while at work are simply acts of distracting individuals. They choose individuals watching tv and driving recklessly on the road to them checking out books. “How did you get so empty? He wondered.

Who takes it out of you? “(Bradbury 44) In this conversation, Guy Montag attempts to speak to his spouse however all she appreciates are the tv characters than she does to him. She even goes as far as to call them her household. In 1984, this can be seen when O’Brien attempts to encourage Winston about Big Brother by trying to make him realize that the celebration owns presence now and there is absolutely nothing he can do but follow. He desired Winston to use the ‘If you can’t beat them then join them’ sort of viewpoint. “Truth just exists in the human mind and nowhere else.

Not in person; only in the mind of the party, which is cumulative and immortal” (Orwell 261) Even Beatty attempts to change Montag’s affinity for books and he attempts to persuade him that they destroy books due to the fact that it always upsets somebody and they want to stop that. “The brand-new society as he describes allow all people abundant or poor, foolish, smart, to get a sense of motion without moving” (Bradbury 56). Brainwashing of minds was among the main goals of both governments in the books and all of these were simply in an attempt once again to keep power.

Due to the incontestable control of the federal government, and it’s oppression to its citizens, the safety of all opposed to the government remain in danger. In 1984, the audience can connect to this due to the equivalent suffering both Julia and Winston went through in the play. And due to the harsh treatments, they were required to betray each other. “I betrayed you,” she stated baldly. “I betrayed you,” he said. She provided him another peek of dislike. “In some cases,” she said, “they threaten you with something– something you can’t stand up to, can’t even consider.

And then you state, ‘Do not do it to me, do it to somebody else, do it to so-and-so.’ And maybe you might pretend, afterwards, that it was only a technique which you simply said it to make them stop and didn’t really suggest it. However that isn’t true. At the time when it occurs you do suggest it. You believe there’s no other way of saving yourself and you’re rather prepared to save yourself that method. You want it to take place to the other person. You don’t give a damn what they suffer. All you appreciate is yourself.” “All you appreciate is yourself,” he echoed. And after that, you don’t feel the very same towards the other person any longer.” “No,” he said, “you do not feel the same.” (Orwell 292) In Fahrenheit 451, it is really evident as there were so many times they wanted to kill Guy Montag the lead character after they might not alter him. They oppressed him a lot and an example of where that can be seen is when Beatty requires him to burn his house and then Beatty puts him under arrest. When Beatty continues to scold Montag, Montag turns the flamethrower on his superior and proceeds to burn him to ashes.

Montag knocks the other firefighters unconscious and runs. The Mechanical Hound, a monstrous maker that Beatty has set to assault Montag, attacks and injects Montag’s leg with a big dose of anaesthetic. Montag manages to damage it with his weapon; then he strolls off the tingling in his leg and escapes with some books that were hidden in his backyard. Both the flexibility from lack of knowledge of the protagonists eventually changes their behaviours from law abiding to law breaking residents and it also led to their new understanding of what constituted life.

Montag is a fireman and in the unique, the firemens are a disciplinary force in society that in fact starts fires instead of stopping them. As when it comes to Winston, initially Montag is not suspected of treachery since he is a ‘model citizen’ who enjoys his job of damaging books, which society has considered as troublesome and saddening. Being part of the group that burns books would seem to those around him as a bad candidate for breaking the law and reading them. Ultimately, nevertheless, there is a modification in Montag, and he begins to want for the understanding, awareness and opportunity that he thinks books can offer.

He considers this thirst as an urge referred to as “poison working up his wrists and into his elbows and his shoulders, and then the jumpover from shoulder blade to shoulder blade like a stimulate jumping a gap” (Bradbury 41). Montag continues to break the law by reading as numerous books as he can. Winston in 1984 is likewise a familiar character that Fahrenheit 451 produced; the lead character breaks the law by dedicating thought criminal offense which is the worst type of crime to dedicate. He dedicates this idea crime when he began composing his journal on page 8. “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER over and over again filling half a page. (Orwell 18) Their offense is what begins their struggle with the government and as such cause the government’s ‘harsh’ action towards them and at the end, they both had paradoxical endings as Winston finally conforms and agree with the federal government while Man Montag continues his battle by signing up with new pals to proceed to search for survivors and restore civilization. A crucial or maybe the most crucial theme that happens in the essay is that of destruction of human worths. In both books, a human worth appears to have been decreased to the most affordable level.

In 1984, there are almost no human worths left in most of individuals of the society and that is how Big Bro likes it. Even the ‘proles’ take pleasure in watching the execution of their peers. “It was an excellent hanging stated Syme reminiscently. I believe it spoils it when they connect their feet together. (Orwell 49). Syme believes that it is all right for people to be hanged and it is not enjoyable when their legs are connected. This is simply to show you the extent to which human worths are no longer revered. It is also the exact same for Fahrenheit 451 when even teenagers eliminate each other for fun whether or not on function it does not matter. I’m afraid of kids my own age. They eliminate each other. Did he always utilize to be that method? (Bradbury 30) The control of the federal government over its people is all so noteworthy here that practically all if not all have actually been beat and both federal government sees absolutely nothing incorrect with it. On the contrary, they like it. Orwell’s 1984 and Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 are both creative visions of what the authors felt society should be worried about becoming. The books offer different details on intriguing scenarios, however they share resemblances in their leaders, the control over their people and the damage of human worths.

The lead characters’ resistance to conform to the norms of their dystopian society resulted in their extreme punishments and betrayal as well their modification from law abiding to law breaking citizens. Although these stories were written around 1950, they are still quite appropriate to the world today. The popularity of these books does dismiss the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however, the risks of a regulated federal government and how noticeable it remains in both novels ought to provide a wake-up call to society on how dangerous regulated governments and how nearly difficult it is to eliminate them.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar