George Orwell’s 1984 Thematic Analysis
1984 George Orwell, author of 1984, explains a world where anonymity is dead. He goes on to tell the reader that this concept of a world might possibly exist in the real life. This idea haunts readers throughout Orwell’s book. Orwell hopes that readers will leave 1984 thinking the possibility of this world is real; enough to question federal government and tread cautiously into the future. Orwell means to depict Oceania realistically enough to persuade contemporary readers that such a society has, in fact, existed and might exist once again if individuals forget the lessons taught by history, or stop working to guard against despotic, totalitarian governments.
These 2 styles: totalitarianism and history, loop the plot and messages in 1984. Orwell sets his story in war-torn London. Thirty to forty bombs drizzle down on the city each week and all over Winston turns, suggestions of the war, such as the Two Minutes Hate and billboards plastered with Party mottos, color his existence. Deprivation, another bi-product of war, awaits the air as greatly as the terrible gunk and stench created by the city’s overcrowded tenements. Upon opening 1984, Orwell’s very first readers, English individuals throughout the late 1940s, would have right away recognized themselves.
Having just emerged from WWII, Londoners would have totally associated to the deprivation and destruction represented in 1984. Nevertheless, while Winston positioned complete blame for his scenario on the shoulders of Big Brother, Londoners would not have recognized the cause of their anguish as the British federal government. Most likely, the British would have blamed Nazi Germany for beginning the war and triggering such mayhem and devastation. Winston’s rebellion against Big Brother would have resonated with contemporary audiences since they too had just recently had a hard time to beat the totalitarian routines of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.
While it is tough to determine the specific stimulates that set off WWII, the people combating in the Allied armies need to clearly have thought that their cumulative mission was to squash totalitarianism and bring back democracy around the globe. Offered this context, 1984’s political messages emerge clearly clear. The Celebration is a totalitarian government. “The horrible thing that the Party had done was to persuade you that mere impulses, simple sensations, were of no account, while at the very same time robbing you of all power over the material world. “( 136) is explaining that the government in 1984 is a totalitarian government.
Neither the Outer Celebration nor the proles (proletariats) have any influence on the instructions of their nation or the guidelines that govern their lives. The Inner Celebration manipulates the media and infiltrates residents’ personal lives to acquire total control over every aspect of human presence, consisting of love and sex. When the propaganda, deprivation, and stiff guidelines fail to transform somebody to Party teaching (INGSOC), the federal government utilizes abuse to brainwash citizens. The truth that the Celebration must turn Winston into a walking zombie to finally squash his inner-revolt, reveals the Celebration’s supreme frailty.
Given that the concepts of INGSOC fail to influence believing people like Winston, the Party has no choice but to utilize extreme force and coercion to remain in power. Orwell hires his readers to acknowledge the evil and frailty of the Celebration and combat to avoid the spread of totalitarianism. While Orwell does not promote for a specific alternative system, undercurrents of Socialism, Democracy, and Capitalism pervade. “History” is another crucial style in 1984. “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed-if all records informed the same tale-then the lie entered history and became reality. Who controls the previous’ ran the Celebration motto, ‘manages the future: who controls the present controls the past. ‘”( 44 ). This quote is frightening to the reader due to the fact that it could occur in today’s society. In lots of methods, Orwell’s novel reads like a history book. 1984warns readers that the Oceania universe will be the future, if individuals stop working to learn the lessons revealed by major historic occasions and figures such as WWI, WWII, Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini (to cite examples from Western and Eastern Europe). The Party comprehended the power of history. A citizenry informed to understand history would not enable the Celebration to endure.
Hence, the Party removed nearly everybody who kept in mind the past prior to Huge Brother, created a new, post-Big Brother history, then controlled history through the Ministry of Fact a lot that it was impossible to ever understand what was happening or what had actually really taken place. It is paradoxical that Winston worked in the Ministry of Truth, changing historical truths to fit the Celebration. “Day by day and practically minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this method every prediction made by the Celebration might be revealed by documentary evidence to have been appropriate; nor was any product of news, or any expression of opinion, which onflicted with the requirements of the minute, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as typically as was required. “( 51) In a little way, Winston contributed to the collective amnesia that pestered Oceania, preserved order, and protected his own powerlessness. However, had Winston not worked in the Ministry of Fact, he would not have gotten the proof he needed to confirm his subconscious and unconscious misgivings about the Party.
In reality, had it not been for several posts about past rebels that crossed his desk, Winston’s internal rage would never have actually strengthened into external rebellion. It is likewise informing that Winston’s dedicates his very first act of disobedience by writing in a diary. The act of recording his present scenarios constituted extreme disloyalty to the Celebration because Winston was in fact recording history. Totalitarian rulers throughout history, consisting of Hitler and Pol Pot (the leader of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia), damaged books and exterminated reporters and intellectuals since they comprehended the power of documents and history.
While Orwell clearly shows that history is mutable, he likewise shows that this type of mutation leads to the death of culture and freedom. Works Cited Orwell, George. 1984. Ed. Erich Fromm. New York City: Harcourt, 1949. Works Consulted “Pol Pot. ” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 11 Dec. 2013. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. “The Second World War. ” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 9 Dec. 2013. Web. 12 Dec. 2013.