StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis of Henr'sy V life - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Henry is a strong imperial leader. His oration to his men at the breach, with its inhuman but exhilarating images of the tiger, the cannon, and the rock, works well as a rhetorical ploy to make them keep fighting in a tough situation. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Analysis of Henrsy V life
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis of Henr'sy V life"

"The play is ironic: that is ..... Henry V is a satire on monarchical government, on imperialism, on the baser kinds of patriorism, and on war" (Gerald Gould). I believe to great extend Gerald Gould's analysis of Henry V is correct. Henry V, a strong, successful ruler whose inner self is often subsumed within his public role. Shakespeare character Henry is a fictive construct, a dramatic character revealed through speech and action within the conventions of the Elizabethan theater. Henry V, often polarize into "ironic" or even satiric; as a protagonist this King has inspired as much dislike as praise and has a monarchical government. Granted, Henry is a strong imperial leader. His oration to his men at the breach, with its inhuman but exhilarating images of the tiger, the cannon, and the rock, works well as a rhetorical ploy to make them keep fighting in a tough situation. But his fantasy projection of what will happen if Harfleur does not surrender, although it can be justified as a bargaining chip, contains an excess of callous ruthlessness--especially in the vision of how the "blind and bloody soldier" will rape "fresh fair virgins" and "shrill-shrieking daughters"--that is hard to condone by complacently referring to what was expected in medieval siege warfare. Henry also damages his image by implicitly allying himself with the tyrannical King Herod when he alludes to his soldiers as " Herod's bloody-hunting slaughtermen". Henry plays a similarly ruthless role in the final scene of the play. He is prepared to remedy the "imperfections" of France (caused by him) only if the French will "buy" peace on his terms; he is even a stickler for the final article of the treaty, that the French King must always refer to him as son and heir. Echoes of his negotiating through threats of rape cast an ironic light on Henry's reference to Katherine as "our capital demand," another of the "maiden cities" to be vanquished (Derek Traversi, 1957). Henry is less successful in bridging the gap when he hides his royal identity and attempts man-to-man conversation on the night before battle. He fails to convince Williams that the King will never agree to be ransomed, and their encounter ends on a contentious note, with Henry accepting a challenge from the soldier. Henry shows his military discipline in approving, without hesitation, the execution of Bardolph for stealing from a church: "We would have all such offenders so cut off". Yet there is no moment of compunction, no recognition of past ties between him and his Eastcheap companion, even though Fluellen makes a point of identifying Bardolph by his carbuncled complexion and nose "like a coal of fire". It is only retroactively linked with Henry's spontaneous and understandable anger over the massacre of the luggage attendants, an anger that then reaches excess in Henry's threat to cut more throats. If temperance is a cardinal virtue of the ruler, Henry has failed again. His behavior on the battlefield veers confusingly between coldblooded practicality and barely restrained fury. Henry is convinced that the course of the war is providentially arranged and that human intervention counts for little: "We are in God's hand, brother" ((Henry V (ed.), 1954, III. vi. 177) and "how thou pleasest, God, dispose the day!" (IV. iii. 133). Often, though, the dramatic context overlays Henry's religious assertions with irony. Henry determines that the campaign against the French "lies within the will of God," but only after declaring his intention to make the Dauphin pay dearly for his ill-advised gift of tennis balls. The favorable portrait of Henry is continually subject to ironic qualification without being totally undercut. Henry's possible chicanery or question the decency and fairness of his tactics modify the portrait of him as a hero without turning him into an antihero. Henry V is shown to us as a great leader, but not an infallible one." Henry Strong leadership shows imperialism that Shakespeare implies, requires cunning as well as open "courage"--the combination that Machiavelli outlines when he advises the prince to be both "fox" and "lion." And far from being a straightforward demonstration of kingship, with Henry displaying various facets of the royal persona in a fairly static way, the play allows for undercurrents of uneasiness or doubt, moments of possible failure as Henry refines his roles as monarch. Henry is projected as a kingly paragon; Canterbury expresses wonder at this new king's attributes in the opening scene. As well as being a great orator, Henry excels in four areas: he can "reason in divinity," he is an expert in "commonwealth affairs," his "discourse of war" is highly impressive, and he can expound on "any cause of policy" (i.e., argue about politics). What is more, Henry goes beyond the rhetorician who theorizes on abstract propositions, for he has put into practice an active rather than a contemplative virtue: . . . The art and practic part of life Must be the mistress to this theoric. (Henry V, 1954, I. i. 51-52) King Henry has much to live up to. Can he establish himself as an accomplished orator, a pious man of God, a statesman-politician, and a military leader All of these roles are manifested, to some degree, as the play progresses, and most of them are touched on in Henry's opening scene. As a patriotic ruler he takes command of the situation and displays his control publicly. The key term here is "resolved." Almost Henry's first words, referring to the legitimacy of his title in France, are "We would be resolved," and once Canterbury's explanations are complete and the King is ready to call in the Dauphin's ambassadors, he closes the debate with "Now are we well resolved" (I. ii. 222). Not only has the issue been clarified, enabling him to proceed, but he is fully determined ("resolved") to go ahead with his military campaign. In addition, Henry projects himself as both responsible and pious before he allows Canterbury to launch into his discussion of Salic law. Concerned with the "truth" of his claim, he urges the Archbishop to expound the case "justly and religiously." In effect the King adopts the role of spiritual authority (the "prelate" who can "reason in divinity") when he warns Canterbury Under this conjuration, speak my lord: For we will hear, note, and believe in heart That what you speak is in your conscience washed As pure as sin with baptism. (29-32) At the end of the Archbishop's speech Henry checks again, in front of witnesses, that his own "conscience" will not be sullied by pursuing a title that is specious: May I with right and conscience make this claim Showing his skill in "commonwealth affairs," he cuts through Canterbury's rousing talk of heroic royal ancestors to discuss instead practical steps to "defend / Against the Scot" while the English troops are away in France. Shrewdly Henry recalls how the Scots invaded England while Edward III was away campaigning in France, but Canterbury, also a politician, caps this by reminding Henry how England under Edward III not only defended itself adequately against the Scots but also captured the Scottish King. The King listens carefully to his counselors; he is persuaded by their pragmatic arguments that one-quarter of the English forces can win the war in France while the rest defend their own country (Russell Jackson and Robert Smallwood, 1988). Henry is "so severe a justicer" that "his people both loved and obeyed him"; he left "no offence unpunished nor friendship unrewarded" and proved a "terror to rebels, and suppressor of sedition." Henry does not hand out rewards for friendship (although he promises "quittance of desert and merit / According to the weight and worthiness" [34-35]), but we do see him firmly administering punishment, acting the part of "severe . . . justicer" so that he can effectively crush sedition. (Henry V, 1954) Henry pursues justice rigorously through the letter of the law. Only God's "mercy" (twice repeated) remains, to which Henry piously commits them. Shakespeare suggests here that kingship entails a firm administering of justice that cannot always be tempered with mercy; moreover, the monarch's show of authority may sometimes depend on the Machiavellian technique of entrapment. Strong leadership, Shakespeare suggests, is a matter of playing the role convincingly and encouraging others to do the same--to become what they act: In peace there's nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility; but when the blast of war blows in our ears, then imitate the action of the tiger. (Henry V (ed.), 1954, III. I. 3-6) Henry has completely appropriated the persona of the soldier, calling it "A name that in my thoughts becomes me best". His threatening speech is thus predicated on a total divorce between the sensitive mortal who is bound to feel "pity" for violated women and butchered babies and the hardened military leader who would fatalistically let his soldiers run amok. If Henry actually allowed this brutality to take place, could he remain a respected ruler, full of "king-becoming graces" Again there is a tenuous balance between the monarch's ruthlessness and "mercy." It is possible, though not certain, that the blood-chilling threats are merely a clever tactic to coerce surrender, so that once the Governor has capitulated Henry can "Use mercy to them all". There is a similar conflict between the King's "lenity" and "cruelty" toward an individual when Henry, while insisting on treating the French with respect and not stealing from their land because "the gentler gamester is the soonest winner," nevertheless approves Bardolph's execution. He reveals no regret over the death of an old comrade for theft. The expedient military leader clearly cannot afford to be sentimental (lexander Leggatt, 1988) Henry's meditation on "ceremony" bitterly explodes the mystique of kingship: its dependence on empty forms, which calls into question its genuine substance. Suddenly the emperor is admitting that he has no clothes. Whatever authority the King possesses he must forge for himself, since "place, degree, and form" have no creative or healing powers. No wonder that Henry deeply resents the "ceremony" that both insulates him from his subjects and traps him in a web of anxieties and public responsibilities. Inevitably he romanticizes the lives of the private man (as "infinite heart's-ease") and the peasant (who "Sleeps in Elysium"), just as he exaggerates the "hard condition" of being a king. On a deeper level, though, he faces up to the implications of his title. When he prays that God will take from his men the "sense of reck'ning" he refers literally to the soldiers' ability to count the huge number of the French enemy, but he also touches on the somber meaning that Williams has introduced just before: a "reckoning" on the Day of Judgment. Thus, it is true that Henry V is a satire on monarchical government, on imperialism, on the baser kinds of patriotism, and on war. As Henry's "bounty" as one of the king-becoming graces, just as Henry has displayed temperance justice to the traitors, "devotion" to God, and "courage" and "fortitude" in battle. But the King's justice is sometimes akin to ruthlessness and his honesty undercut by deviousness or cunning, although these too (the play suggests) may be necessary attributes of kingship (Ronald S. Berman, 1962). Henry V reflects the Renaissance "acceptance of deception and intrigue and violence as legitimate instruments of political behavior." And for Henry the dark side of royalty is its utter isolation--the king, vulnerable to betrayal, can have no close friends-- as well as its deceptive appearance of glory. Since the "ceremony" of monarchy is merely symbolic, the king must work on his own initiative, with talents honed through trial and risk, to win solid achievements for his country. Work Cited Henry V (ed.), The Arden Shakespeare ( 1954), p. xvi. Derek Traversi, Shakespeare: From Richard II to Henry V ( Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957) Russell Jackson and Robert Smallwood (eds.), Players of Shakespeare 2 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 5. Ronald S. Berman, "Shakespeare's Alexander: Henry V," CE, 23 ( 1962), 532-39 lexander Leggatt, Shakespeare's Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays ( London and New York: Routledge, 1988), p. 114. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analysis of Henr'sy V life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Analysis of Henr'sy V life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1499159-analysis-of-henrsy-v-life
(Analysis of Henr'Sy V Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Analysis of Henr'Sy V Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1499159-analysis-of-henrsy-v-life.
“Analysis of Henr'Sy V Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1499159-analysis-of-henrsy-v-life.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis of Henr'sy V life

Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death by Henry Patrick

In this rhetoric notion “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” Richard Schumann leads the interpretation in regards to colonial foundation.... The rhetoric purpose is evidence in this writing through Henry's articulation.... Patrick Henry states, “No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Salvation and Redemption of Faustus and Dorian

was titled The History of the Damnable life and Deserved Death of Doctor John Faustus.... In this oration, Pico says that of all the creatures given life by God it is man who is the most unique.... Christopher Marlowe and Oscar Wilde were separated chronologically by two centuries of time and historical thought yet both treat similar themes of salvation and redemption in two of their greatest works....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

The Exeter Story's Organizational Structure

nbsp;     Thus, in view of all the actions of the new managers need proper analysis and considerations especially regarding ethics and moral values in order toIn this paper the author demonstrates how to avoid company loss, creating a firm organization wherein employees can work freely, equally delegated workload, smooth operation and harmonious work relationship among employees....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Shakespeares Sources and Context

This is the response King Henry V gives to Dauphin's messenger who delivers a crate of tennis balls sent by Dauphin as a mocking reminder of Henry's irresponsible and wayward youth.... With a menacing and icy wrath, Henry turns the Dauphin's jest on its head, threatening the messenger with a promise to treat the field of France as a tennis court and play a game for Dauphin's father's crown. … This quote from the play Henry V, is the last of the four pieces in Shakespeare's second tetralogy, which treats major events of English history in the 14th and early 15th centuries....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

White Paper on the film Henry V

Citing the reality of life and death in his speech, King Henry V's St.... Thus it brought another dimension to view life, enough to motivate people to move in his direction.... Leadership views vary on the principles being applied by each distinct type of leaders thus made leadership a dynamic in human trait. There are several types of leaders....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analysis of Patrick Henrys Speech on Liberty

The paper "analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech on Liberty" discusses that the effective use of imagery transcends the limitations of language and adds a whole different dimension to the level of discourse.... nbsp; The analysis of the text shall be in accordance with the theory by James Paul Gee that “interaction with the text is necessarily a socially mediated process” (St.... It is generally agreed that An Introduction to Discourse analysis (Gee, 1999) is one of James Paul Gee's truly significant treatise on the nature of Discourse, as acknowledged by Rodina (2007), Stibbe (2006), Jarvis (2006), Collins (2000), and Holmes (2000)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow Style Analysis

The author expresses the importance of life but he agrees that life and death are in the hands of God.... The author expresses the importance of life but he agrees that life and death is in the hands of God.... ?With secret shame I feel my pulses beat, my forehead burn,The poet explains that although there is a fallen hero he feels pain and tension in his heart but he cannot give anything in return since it is only God who takes and gives life....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Analysis of Olson's Dictatorship, Democracy, and Patrick Henry's Speech Regarding Liberty

The paper "analysis of Olson's Dictatorship, Democracy, and Patrick Henry's Speech Regarding Liberty" states that the two authors differ in their views on freedom and subjugation.... His fiery speech ended with the immortal line, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?...
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us