Political Mindsets Promoted in 1984 (AP PROMPT) 1987-Some books and plays appear to promote modifications in social or political attitudes or in customs. Select such a novel or play and note briefly the particular mindsets or customs that the author obviously wishes to modify. Then evaluate the methods the author uses to influence the reader’s or audience’s views.
Prevent plot summary. Do not write about a movie or tv program.
The world sixty years back as seen by George Orwell was a various location than the one we reside in and experience today. Innovation was rapidly establishing and become a part of every day life. Atomic warfare was still a new threat, and the aftershock of its use in World War II was still raw in everyone’s minds. Totalitarianism was viewed as a social experiment of sorts, and not having yet experienced the Cold War, a few of America’s great minds were still taking a look at these federal governments with an open mind.
Orwell believed that society required to be forewarned about both the possible and real threats of these issues, so his manifesto, 1984, was his call for social modification, his call to respect the dangers that innovation, war, and totalitarianism introduced. In 1984, George Orwell goes along the very same lines as many other prominent contemporary authors such as Kurt Vonnegut and Margaret Atwood to produce an ideal unfavorable paradise.
In this imaginary society, Oceania, the federal government hands out ruthlessness, oppression, and propaganda as is they were food stamps, and every aspect of the society, down to journal entries, private conversations, and even individual thoughts, is kept track of by the Celebration through intrusive devices called telescreens. The Party utilizes whatever at its disposal to impose complete and utter control, from a modifying of language to constant security, from historical factual manipulation to physical and psychological abuse.
As an outcome of the government’s inadequate ruling and consistent control, the members of the Celebration live in a metropolitan, industrial hell. Orwell vividly and continuously demonstrates the results of this broken society, and the image he paints isn’t a pleasant one: Oceania is continuously at war, Party members must totally catch mindlessness and conformity to make it through, the society is living in a state of decay and poverty, inequality is wide-spread and all consuming, and even the structure and loyalty of households is almost completely liquified.
The truth that Orwell’s Oceania is imitated the totalitarian governments of the mid twentieth century is a very finely veiled one, and the review of these societies is more than apparent. His message, however, isn’t reserved just for these communistic cultures; it’s also directed at us. The moral of the story isn’t simply that police states, mental control, and misuse of innovation are bad, it’s also that we can’t obliviously relax and allow such criminal offenses against mankind to continue or perhaps gain power in the first location.
Orwell’s warning is effective, too, due to the fact that he wasn’t just creating a dystopia, he was literally suggesting that this fictional hell could become our truth in thirty-five years if we didn’t alter the method we took a look at things. We did make it past 1984 without devolving into this reality, however the social commentary presented is still appropriate and will constantly continue to be, since the message truly is to keep questioning the world around us and decline any form of injustice, which’s one that is essential enough to remember for the entire foreseeable future.