StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of "The Government of the United Kingdom: From a System of Government to Governance" paper analyzes and discusses the extent of the UK’s shift from a system of government to governance by drawing on cases from the international or national arena…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.9% of users find it useful
The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance"

The UK Government: From A System of Government to Governance Introduction Political analysts have claimed that the government of the United Kingdom (UK) has moved from government to governance, or more specifically, from a unitary state government to network governance (Watts 2006). The objective of this paper is to analyse and discuss the extent of UK’s shift from a system of government to governance by drawing on cases from the international or national arena. In order to determine the extent of this shift, the governance description should begin with the concept of policy networks or groups of organisations gathered around a main government position or sector. These groups generally incorporate big business, professions and trade unions. The cooperation of these groups is needed by the central departments for delivery of services. They require their support because British government seldom delivers services. It normally makes use of other departments to do so (Moran 2005). Moreover, there are quite numerous groups to talk to hence government should amass interests. It demands the rightful representatives for that policy domain. The groups on the other hand require the financial support and legislative power that only the government can grant (Wright 2003). Policy networks are an established component of British government. Normally, policy networks develop an agreement about what they are doing, an agreement that fulfils at least a few of the objectives of all concerned. They have developed customary approaches in decision making. They are considered public service’s private government, mockingly identified by the New Right as ‘producer groups’ (Bevir & Rhodes 2003: 57) that exploit government for the fulfilment of their own sectional motives. The Thatcher conservative government pursued to lessen their authority by employing markets to provide public services, sidestepping active networks and restraining the ‘rights’ of professions, usually by putting them into thorough management and financial regulations. Yet these corporate marketisation and management developments had unforeseen outcomes. They disjointed the arrangements for delivering public services, generating demands for groups to collaborate with one another to carry out the delivery of public services (Richards & Smith 2003). To put it simply, and ironically, marketisation reproduced the networks it intended to change. In general, sets of organisations currently deliver services of the welfare state. What happened, in fact, is the proliferation of networks in UK government. The process of fragmentation not merely produced new networks; it too enhanced the membership of active networks, integrating the charitable and private sectors (Wright 2003). Furthermore, the government traded direct controls for indirect regulations thus core departments are now neither essentially nor consistently the pivot of a network. The government has the power to determine the restrictions to network activities and decisions: after all, it financially supports the services. However, it has also reinforced its reliance on different networks. The process of devolution to Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales basically contributes an additional layer of intricacy that is prone to stimulate defensive networks (Bevir & Rhodes 2003). Thus, this discussion will begin with the other narrative regarding the British government with the notion that governance denotes ‘governing with and through networks’ (Goldsmith & Eggers 2004: 22). The term ‘governance’ is applied as shorthand to include change in the public sector; to sum up the transition in British government from the powerful executive (government) to networks (governance). It denotes the evolving structure of the British state and to the means wherein the networks’ informal power shapes, enhances and replaces the state’s formal authority (Goldsmith & Eggers 2004). Strong Executive A persistent argument about the British executive puts emphasis on the relative authority of prime minister and cabinet. Even though the argument has its detractors, political analysts still grieve about the presidentialism of Blair. Their criticism believes the optimal way to analyse the executive is to examine major functions and their officials. Rather than a positional framework, advocates of the strong executive identify it by its responsibilities. Rather than enquiring which function is vital, they enquire which positions characterise the innermost piece of British government (Bevir & Rhodes 2003). The fundamental responsibilities of the British executive are to unify and incorporate policies of the central government and to function as final negotiators of conflicts between various components of the government apparatus. Political institutions apart from the prime minister and cabinet, involving, for instance, the Cabinet Office or the Treasury, can perform these tasks (Wright 2003). However, the debate about the power of the British executive is overplayed. It is apparent there were constantly numerous restrictions. With the shift from government to governance, furthermore, the restrictions have turn out to be ever more persistent. The narrative of the past two decades is defined by fragmentation complicating the process of centralisation as a divided executive aims to enhance horizontal cooperation among organisations and departments and vertical cooperation between sectors and their organisational networks. An accidental outcome of this pursuit for central regulation has been a ‘hollowing-out’ of the powerful executive (Rhodes 1994). The ‘hollowing-out’ of the state implies that the progress of governance has weakened the capability of the strong executive to take action successfully, making it more and more dependent on mediation or diplomacy (Bevir & Rhodes 2003: 58): The state has been hollowed-out from above by for example international interdependence, and from below by for example marketisation and networls, and sideways by agencies. On the inside the British strong executive was by now typified by policy networks and sporadic and selective cooperation. It has been increasingly hollowed out on the inside by the unforeseen outcomes of marketisation, which disjointed delivery of public service, proliferated networks and expanded networks’ membership. Sooner or later devolution to Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales will require further complexities. Certainly, there could be a demonstration outcome that will provide further impetus to the pressure for local devolution in England (Watts 2006). On the outside the state is as well being hollowed-out by EU’s membership and other commitments with the international community (Moran 2005). Menon and Wright (1998) claim that Britain has ‘forged an efficient policy making and coordinating machine’ (Menon & Wright 1998: 48) due to the fact that the government decides and acts harmoniously; it has been triumphant in its ‘basic strategy of opening up and liberalising the EU’s economy’ (ibid: 48). Rhodes (1994) proposes that the membership of UK to the EEC and involvement in the ensuing creation of the EU has witnessed power transfer upwards from the ‘central state to a supranational tier of government’ (Garnett & Lynch 2007, 203). As argued by Rhodes, the transition from government to governance has weakened the authority of the UK government. Or, as Rhodes eloquently put it, “the British state is being eroded or eaten away” (Rhodes 1994: 149). Devolution will furnish extra momentum to the cycle, from government to governance and back. It could be one of the most important developments of the post-war years since it strengthens decentralisation with fragmented political power. Devolution to the English territories will never occur in the being of the subsequent Blair parliament. However, the novel Regional Development Agencies and the guarantee of regional mandates on whether to bring out elected legislative bodies have not stopped the regional demands for devolution. Instead, political decentralisation hangs on the political schema (Watts 2006). The civil service could eventually face a mixed blanket of local assembles and elected governors in England, in addition to the devolved governments of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, which will require a new government apparatus to handle intergovernmental affairs for the EU and for local matters. Diplomatic talent in intergovernmental negotiation will turn out to be a major component of a bureaucrat’s selection. Britain will experience the federal-provincial peacekeeping quite typical of other Westminster structures such as Canada and Australia. As stated by Sir Richard Wilson of the Home Civil Service, ‘the civil service are going to have to learn skills that we haven’t learned before’ (Bevir & Rhodes 2003: 59). In other words, the networking capabilities more and more required to manage delivery of public service will also be at the finest in handling the intergovernmental affairs of a devolved Britain. On the other hand, ‘Britain as a unitary state’ (Bevir & Rhodes 2003: 59) underlines centralised power, political assimilation, a directive operating code enforced through system of government and the authority of the centre to invalidate decentralised authorities. On the contrary, the governance account underlines political fragmentation, decentralisation, interdependence and devolution. Conclusions Any attempt to determine the extent of the shift of the UK government from centralisation (government) to decentralisation (governance) will consistently encourage the chance of appearing biased. The governance description opposes a perspective of British government that views Britain as a unified state with a core executive. Apparently the strong executive of Britain can function determinedly. Just as apparent, the centre organises and puts into practice policies as deliberated some of the time. But present accounts of the Westminster framework attach very little significance to the disagreeable laws of unplanned outcomes. Governments become unsuccessful because they are fastened into power-reliant affairs and because they should govern with and through intricate organisational networks. The governance description obviously implies that to implement a directive operating code creates malfunction into the policy design. This form of centralisation will be complicated by interdependence and fragmentation that, consequently, will bring about short periods of centralisation. The governance description recognises various rationales for deviating from the constraints of the Westminster paradigm. The first step is devolution, and it requires too much effort and force. Devolved governments are independent, they decide and act autonomously. References Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R.A.W., 2003. Interprepting British Governance. New York: Routledge. Garnett, M. & Lynch, P., 2007. Exploring British Politics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. George, S., 1992. Britain and the European Community: The Politics of Sem-Detachment. Oxford: Oxford University . Goldsmith, S. & Eggers, W.D., 2004. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Menon, A. & Wright, V., 1998. The Paradoxes of Failure: British EU Policy Making in Comparative Perspective. Public Policy and Administration , 13 (4), pp. 46-66. Moran, M., 2005. Politics and Governance in the UK. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Rhodes, R., 1994. The Hollowing Out of the State. Political Quarterly , 65 (2), 138-151. Richards, D. & Smith, M.J., 2003. Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Watts, D., 2006. British Government and Politics: A Comparative Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Wright, T., 2003. British Politics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance Coursework - 2, n.d.)
The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance Coursework - 2. https://studentshare.org/politics/1728351-politics
(The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance Coursework - 2)
The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance Coursework - 2. https://studentshare.org/politics/1728351-politics.
“The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance Coursework - 2”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1728351-politics.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The UK Government: From a System of Government to Governance

Role of Parliament in the British Government

This house has been previously criticized for its compositions with a large number of sitting representatives hailing from a single party.... This house has been previously criticized for its compositions with a large number of sitting representatives hailing from a single party.... This paper “Role of Parliament in the British government” will seek to determine whether parliament in Britain is effective in providing a useful and effective role in the matters of the government and to what extent they do this to influence parliamentary activities and vice versa....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Federalism and Business

(2005, 14), a majority of stable and economically developed countries use a federal system of government.... It is easier for a federal government to perform experiments on policy changes since it can use a selected state as a ‘lab rat'.... It can also perform more effective control in the respective state markets due to ‘closeness' of the government to the people.... Even though the governments may use the federal government to reduce illegal trades in order to maximize on the amount of taxes it collects, this promotes businesses whose markets are put at risk by counterfeits and illegal transactions which are expensive (European Center for Security Studies, 2010, 103)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Government Attempt to Manage the Performance of Public Services

the uk government of 2001 was a reelected government for another term upon a manifesto that said, “Renewal of public services” (76) It was heard to want to request to be given a third term in office courtesy of its ability to enhance service delivery at a higher level.... These are especially those ones considered by government to end up impacting the public good.... Almost the entire community services are focused on the system of social… On the other hand, some services may be granted to persons with specific needs like disability services delivery and age care....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Comparative governance

It helps the government to represent… There are numerous benefits of representative government such as engaging diverse communities, drawing on the skills of a group which is very broad, and managing the use of political power efficiently.... There are various roles in political participation such as the ability to speak out freely, assuming an important role in the management of public affairs, opportunity to register as a candidate, conducting campaigns and to get elected and hold office at various departments of government (Andrew and Tremblay, 1998, p....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Project Management Theories in the UKs Welfare System Project

These problems require the government to take responsibility and solve them.... Experts advised the government to take things slow and take time to implement the policy (Institute, 2009, p.... From the paper "Project Management Theories in the uk's Welfare System Project" it is clear that the project had the ambition to assist the citizens of the country.... the uk's government wanted to improve the welfare system.... It could be of advantage if there were good project governance....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Authority and Power in International Affairs

he former Chief Scientific Advisor to the uk government, Sir David King had once famously remarked that the phenomena of global warming and climate change are more dangerous than a social disorder in the form of terrorism.... In all forms of government, there is always an element of dissent and disobedience to the authority of the state.... hellip; The author states that King's concerns about the uk's security are quite relevant in discussing state authority and governance....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Aarhus Convention Compliance by the UK

The paper “Aarhus Convention Compliance by the uk” demonstrates the lack of a conducive environment for a judicial procedure in the uk, a governments' reluctance to adhere to the convention.... Exceptional application of favorable judicial procedures in the uk appears to be discriminative and limiting.... the uk is a signatory and debate has been rife in some circles about the commitment of the uk governments to comply with the provisions of the Aarhus Convention....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Governments ICT strategy and the Transparency Expenditure

(Wettenhall, 2001) points out that there has been pressure from the society, from time to time, for the government to scale up the effectiveness of its ICT sector while minimizing costs for the good of the public.... Better governance is thus achieved evidenced by the IT reformsA number of studies point out that the public sector has lagged behind in terms of information technology and knowledge management as “administrative, executive and judicial bodies continue to evolve into an electronic work environment pushed by paperback” (Arora, 2011)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us