Sociological Ideas in Lord of the Flies
Lord of the Flies is an excellent work to examine utilizing sociological concepts, considering that the story revolves around a group of kids stranded on an island. Instantly, one can forecast that the kids will struggle to impart and maintain social order, a principle which is the focus of chapter 6 in our sociology text. The discussion on the beach in between Ralph and Piggy plainly reveals Piggy”s demand for social order to prevent the chaos that would inevitably ensue. Ralph and Piggy stumble upon their very first sign of order when they discover the conch swept up on the sand. They use this to gather up the two distinct groups into a session that does result in some productivity, yielding a prominent leader in Ralph.
However foreshadowing of conflict is evident in Jack”s obvious desire for authoritarian guideline. Consequently, leadership is developed early in this work and leadership styles (between Ralph and Jack) will be the reason for divergence within the initial group. Additionally, the society will initially base their standards in synchrony with the society they left, however as their stay evolves into a struggle for life deviant behavior will start to eventuate and their standards will move internally. Deviance is foreshadowed when the pre-pubescents discover a bloody pig pushing the ground.
The fight between excellent and wicked will unfold as the excellent will be represented by the group ready to sustain their previous standards and evil by the group, which is willing to differ the standard. This is the inescapable outcome when resources are scarce and the competitors is strong.
The formation of social groups takes place immediately as the young boys find each other and recognize they are stranded on an island. The kids represent an unique classification of middle-upper class school young boys from England. Their category should have a subdivision because it seems as if there are 2 distinct age groups, which are represented by kids in the early grammar stages and pre-adolescent boys. When the very first conference is eventually attained by the existence of the conch, one can initially observe that there are groups which will undoubtedly form into a secondary group as an entire and consequently numerous main groups will form. The need for a sense of belonging and relationship will buffer the demands that are put upon the kids in their secondary group.
This secondary group is taken charge by Ralph who insists on utilizing a Democratic system to choose a leader and through his advisory committee (Piggy) he learns that establishment and maintenance of social order is a necessity. The conch represents the first defining symbol presented in the story and probably the most specifying sign throughout. The conch is utilized by the young boys to represent social order, subsequently, whoever is in possession of the conch receives the right to speak and develop rules and guidelines.
Piggy must resort the conch quite often since his authority is disregarded by the majority of the boys. This is based on his physical look, which triggers an amplification of discrimination and increased tendency to view Piggy as a deviant individual. Although Piggy is the most intelligent and logical thinker on the island he receives much criticism as an outcome of his physical appearance and condition. His adulthood recommendations, specs, obesity, and asthmatic condition all add to the universal tendency to perceive his discrepancy from the standard. It”s instantly apparent that Jack will pioneer in his evil and deviant representation.
This is clearly seen in Jack”s blatant remarks towards Piggy and his internalized objectives to rule in an authoritarian style instead of Ralph”s efforts at democratic management. Jack”s choir represents a primary group that progressively differs the “good” group (Ralph”s group) and forms their own internal inner circle. The enabling of Jack”s group is enhanced by Ralph”s department of labor, which assigns Jack the task of forming a searching sector to provide food for the secondary group as a whole. Meanwhile, Ralph will appoint his group as being responsible for the building of shelter.
Besides the basic group principles, it seems as if there is a distinct loner amongst the two groups. Simon is the character who represents the loner. I can”t really consider a distinct reason, however it appears as if Simon is the supreme representation of great. Simon appears to be drawn to the mysterious monster that is on the mountain and appears to end up being a contributing medium for the foreshadowing of an evil takeover. The ultimate crime is dedicated when the hunters mistakenly eliminated Simon. Simon”s murder appears to further damage the unrestrained society and accelerate their discrepancy. To elaborate on the social group ideas, one need to take a look at the inner operations and social characteristics, which are ultimately used to foreshadow different conflicts through the establishment of groups and subsequent cliques.
Ralph and Piggy”s dyad incipiently represent the inner circle of their group in which the decision-making processes remain in the hands of an elite few (a dyad which appears to weaken from Jack”s tryad). Normally, development of an inner circle arises from the clashing values and beliefs in between a group and its leader. In this case, Ralph consults with Piggy due to the fact that he understands his insight and because the majority of the other members are too young to think rationally anyways. Consequently, the “behind the scenes choices” are made by Ralph and Piggy and the manual labor is left up to the kids who help in shelter building and construction. By the way, Piggy”s inner circling around fat ass doesn”t perform any manual work.
The establishment of an inner circle can also be seen in Jack”s searching group. Plainly, Maurice and Roger represent Jack”s 2 close and nearly equally deviant fans. To additionally elaborate, I can state that both inner circles are carrying out networking techniques for their own advantage.
Putting aside the organized analysis of groups, this masterful work is just a representation of man”s inherently wicked nature, which points to the incorporating social theme of increasing deviant behavior which ensues through the lack of social order. These children had actually been evacuated from their regulated society, it was only a matter of time prior to the absence of civilization would penetrate their mind and demoralize their acts.
I understand we viewed the current video representation of this work, however I have to describe the source of this masterpiece, which is William Golding. I remember this novel clearly, because I enthusiastically read it in high school. Golding is simply revealing the deviant behavior of male through foreshadowing and symbolism methods, which brilliantly portray the progression and immersion of evil upon the island.
One can see this through the preliminary department of labor and development of groups. At first, Ralph had most of the people until “good” symbols began to vanish and “wicked” signs took control of. The crushing of Piggy”s glasses represented the weakening of hope for discovery, considering that the significant fire triggering resource was lost. The murder of Simon signified the loss of the supreme good. At the same time, the masks of the hunters and their increasing capability to hunt represented their intensifying propensity to devote criminal activities as a result of no social control.
Mayhem would make its existence felt! The masks may be a representation of their permitted capability to commit the criminal offense. Gradually, Jack” s group gained the majority of the population as the lack of social order would evoke the evil in everyone. Piggy”s death ended up being the supreme criminal offense and evil would reach its peak as a result. The only representation of excellent left on the island was Ralph who ultimately ended up in a battle to protect his own presence. Luckily, Ralph encountered the rescuing Pilot, who ended the evil climax of the hunters desire to murder Ralph.
The deviant acts that took place in Lord of the Flies can likewise be analyzed by making use of the numerous sociological theories. The control theory states that deviant acts are suppressed and order is preserved through both inner and outer controls. In terms of this specific representation, the external controls progressively fade and by the end the only genuine external control left is Ralph”s presence as a leader, which was virtually disregarded. The inner controls represent various forms of internalized moralities, which seem to be overtaken within this depiction since there are no external controls delegated inhibit deviant behavior. Another theory that can be used to this work is the labeling theory.
Symbolic interactionists are supporters of this theory, which mentions that behaviors designed by the leader of a group are also used up by the fans of the group subsequent recognition of status precedes to dictate particular actions. Jack”s management basically affected Maurice and Roger. Ralph”s department of labor appointments are highly relevant to the application of this theory considering that Jack and his fans started to relate to their occupation as hunters. They started to savagely eliminate pigs, which resulted in the ensuing unintentional murder of Simon, purposeful murder of Piggy, and tried murder of Ralph.
To conclude, this extraordinary work highlights many sociological concepts and highlights the central theme of civilization, which is social control. Jointly, is the scary notion that man is inherently evil, undermining our newfound taste of civilization and emphasizing our primitive roots.