Neighborhoods usually yield a specifically physical connection that may not cause any psychological impact. American modernist William Faulkner incisively outlines this circumstance among his short stories, in which the lead character is continually alienated by the fellow members of her town’s society. Within that story, “A Rose for Emily,” viewpoint and particular motifs are used to convey his meaning of distancing one individual, Miss Emily, from a well-defined group, the people of Jefferson.
Upon reading “A Rose for Emily,” one will bear in mind of the reality that the perspective remains in the unusual very first individual plural, which Faulkner utilizes to dissociate Miss Emily from the other townspeople. After Homer Barron, the guy Miss Emily is regularly seen with which the residents anticipate she will marry, relocations in with her, individuals of Jefferson take cautious note as always. The narrator describes that “she had blood-kin under her roofing once again and we sat back to see advancements” (161-162). The narrator is illustrated as “we” rather than the more common “I” or merely a character’s name. The “we” can be categorized as the people of Jefferson, where the short story is set. This classification is utilized to divide and separate Emily from the exclusive group. Also, when conveying to the reader that the citizens “relaxed to view,” Faulkner selects diction that depicts them as visitors to a museum or as an audience being captivated by an entertainer, one that the reader can identify is most likely reluctant. Faulkner’s decision to utilize first individual plural as the narrative voice for this narrative recommends that the general community of Jefferson excludes Miss Emily and does not enable her to connect with them, so that she exclusively functions as part of the town’s gossip.
Throughout the work, Faulkner utilizes popular motifs to persistently explain Emily as being a static, traditional, and decayed badge for the town of Jefferson to observe. To stress this vibrant, he manipulates expressive words with undertones that suggest old-fashioned qualities. These descriptions also play a part in detaching Emily from the community. As a part of Emily’s character exposition, the storyteller defines her as “a tradition … a sort of hereditary commitment upon the town, dating from that day in 1894” (156 ). This characterization suggests that Emily has been a part of Jefferson for a substantial time period, as shown by the words “custom” and “genetic.” Furthermore, Faulkner’s usage of the word “dating” leads the reader to think that Emily is merely an archaic member of the town; she runs out date and quickly to be removed in order to more improve Jefferson. Although the titular character is applauded for the popularity she has actually unintentionally achieved, the language in “A Rose for Emily” makes it clear that both Emily’s popularity and connection to the town are fading rapidly.
The townspeople of Jefferson’s indisputable curiosity towards Miss Emily and her lifestyle draws one’s attention to the eponymous character by highlighting that she has some sort of remarkable element. Faulkner includes fascination as another concept in his work by depicting the people of Jefferson as revealing superficial compassion for Emily, when in truth they are merely immersed in the significant part of her life that she is hiding. After Emily’s death, the narrator remarks that the ladies mainly attended her funeral service “out of interest to see the within her house” (155 ). Faulkner is summarizing the fact that the ladies of Jefferson are changing an action that is usually done out of regard for the departed individual with one that is self-centered and contemptuous. By revealing the women’s lack of grief after Emily’s death, Faulkner is demonstrating to the reader that Miss Emily is not completely part of this close-knit neighborhood. Hence, the reader can conclude that the female citizens of Jefferson just appreciate the gossip that Emily supplies, rather than about her health and wellbeing.
Although a reader may anticipate a small town such as Jefferson to maintain a carefully knit neighborhood, the one portrayed in this work of Faulkner’s skillfully represents quite the opposite. Emily’s alienated existence in Jefferson leaves the impression on the reader that she is separated from the community because of her archaism; nevertheless, the continuous scandal that she offers to the town satisfies its people’s desire for drama. Emily is written to display how she impacts, either favorably or negatively, to the function of Jefferson’s neighborhood, but one can just question how the town behaves as an entire after Emily’s death.