There are many characters that are called in Shirley Jackson’s short story, “The Lotto”. Mr. Summers, a kindly guy who runs a coal organisation, Mr.
Martin and his children, Baxter and Bobby. There is Mr. Graves, the male who assisted Mr. Summers prepare the lottery game, and Old Guy Warner. There is Mr. Hutchinson, Mrs. Hutchinson, and their child Eva and son-in-law, Don– simply to name a few. And although Jackson’s story has lots of characters, she is most thinking about the social phenomenon of the lottery game than she remains in the characters, themselves.
Instead, the characters work as a way to depict “a graphic demonstration of the meaningless violence and general inhumanity in people’s lives” (213 ). From the start of the story, throughout, and in the end, Jackson defines her view of society’s insouciant mindset toward violence with the villagers’ apathetic lifestyle. Every year on June 27th, the families of the town (and of other towns, too) collect in the center of town and participate in a lottery game which culminates with the stoning death of a member of among the households.
This heinous tale takes place amidst a pleasant setting, “The morning of June 27th was clear and bright, with the fresh heat of a full-summer day; the flowers were progressing profusely and the lawn was highly green” (213 ). She composes of the kids playing and little boys gathering stones that are stockpiled and safeguarded and ready for the kill. Jackson stupefies the reader as she describes how the lottery game is carefully prepared by Mr. Summers and Mr. Graves, with such pomp and circumstance: “There was a good deal of fussing to be done before Mr.
Summers stated the lottery open” (214 ). Then there’s bad Mrs. Hutchinson, who, in her threatening late arrival, is welcomed by Mr. Summers, “Thought we were going to need to get on without you, Tessie”, and she jokingly replies, “Wouldn’t have me leave m’dishes in the sink, now would you, Joe?” (215 ). It is this kind of small-talk amongst the villagers that makes this incredulous social phenomenon more substantial than the characters. As fate would have it, Mr. Hutchinson draws the slip of paper with the black dot on it. “You didn’t offer him time sufficient to take any paper he wanted.
I saw you. It wasn’t fair!” (217 ). Fair? Because her other half draws the paper with the black dot on it, it is inescapable that someone from her family or perhaps herself, will be stoned to death. “Be a good sport, Tessie. Everybody took the exact same possibility” (217 ). Even the innocent kids are included in the lottery. Do these individuals have any sense of right or incorrect? Tessie Hutchinson draws the paper with the black dot on it. Her neighbors, her buddies, “and somebody provided little Davy Hutchinson a couple of pebbles” (218 ), with which to toss upon his mother.
This sick ritual spares no one. The simple idea of this annual lottery game is mind-boggling. The matter-of-fact method which the villagers brought themselves throughout the occasion as though they are performing an election of some sort is unconscionable. Jackson’s writing is brimming with obdurate expressions. As the stoning begins, “All right, folks, let’s finish rapidly”, (218 ). They want to “be through in time to enable the villagers to get home for midday supper” (213 ). Astounding. Hi Lisa, I really delighted in the insight you provided in your journal.
You make very good use of the book by consisting of a variety of citations in your essay and your vocabulary definitely contributes to the reader’s understanding of your journal and the passage in general. While you have ample proof to support your claims throughout your entry, I found a few grammatical and technical errors that I would like to mention: 1. )
“And although Jackson’s story has numerous characters, she is most interested in the social phenomenon of the lottery game than she remains in the characters, themselves.– You do not need a comma before “themselves”, as a comma separates the thoughts and practically prepares the reader for a brand-new idea. 2.) “She composes of the children playing and little boys gathering stones that are stocked and guarded and all set for the kill.”– A better way of composing this could be: “She composes of kids playing and collecting stones to be stocked, protected, and prepared for the kill.” 3.) “Jackson stupefies the reader as she explains how the lotto is diligently prepared by Mr. Summers and Mr.
Graves, with such pomp and circumstance …”– Again, you do not need a comma prior to “with such pomp and scenario”, as you are not presenting a brand-new idea. 4.) Putting “unbelievable” at the end of your journal deteriorates it a bit as you do not even more the claim and offer it some proof. In general, I believe you did a truly great job addressing the concern and providing solid proof to your claims. From your journal essay, I had the ability to see that the social phenomenon that the writer is speaking about is the desensitizing of our culture as a whole! Good work and all the best for the rest of the term!