The Lotto Action Paper
“The Lottery’ Action Paper Shirley Jackson’s extremely intriguing short story, ‘The Lottery game,” was evidently rather the debate when it first appeared in The New Yorker (Jackson 208). One can easily think that the factor for such mass unrest was the story’s violent content. Nevertheless, humanity is not constantly extremely kind; human beings can be harsh animals. In Ms. Jackson’s story, this theme of violence and ruthlessness is revealed, and one can not assist but question if all those New Yorker reviewers provided her negative feedback because they were insulted by the story’s sensible approach toward the mankind.
Ms. Jackson makes splendid use of paradox, meaning, and implied man v. Society dispute to make her readers understand that, in certain cases, society may in fact accept what some of us deem unethical. Since the beginning of time, people have been spreading about all sorts Of principles. Common sense would generally inform us which of these must be appropriate and which must not, however society does not constantly follow standard laws. In “The Lotto,” the line in between “appropriate principles” and “undesirable concepts” is blurred to the point where we can barely even tell hat there is a line at all.
The villagers in the story take to carrying out a yearly lottery in which the so-called “winner is awarded by being stoned to death. By today’s standards, getting stoned would not precisely be commonly considered a nice “award” for winning the lottery game, and it remains in this example that irony makes its grandest efficiency. Another big example of paradox which I discovered was Mr. Summers’ name itself. This could rather possibly crossover into the importance classification, however it is ironic in the fact that the word “summer season” frequently evokes cheerful imagery; Mrs. Jackson even explains Mr.
Summertimes as being “a round-faced, jolly guy” (209 ). Nevertheless, in this story,” [t] he lottery game was conducted … By Mr. Summer seasons, who had energy and time to dedicate to civic activities” (209 ). It is weird that the author would not have chosen a more solemn-sounding name for the conductor of such a macabre act. Perhaps this is among her methods of showing us that society does, indeed, accept concepts that a few of us believe are unethical. Significance is yet another technique which is utilized on a regular basis throughout this story. The first example of which is the name of Decide Dielectric.
As any student of French would understand, the term “Dielectric,” which is never ever used in lowercase, implies “of the cross.” In the context of the story, one can presume that the “cross” about which the translation speaks refers to the cross that Christ was crucified upon. This crosses over into the foreshadowing classification, also; it lets us know in advance that something bad, probably death by murder, will take place. This, in itself, is yet another crossover; it enters into the allusion classification, seeing as it mentions the Crucifixion. Mr.
Graves’ name is yet another example of significance, for obvious factors; his name recommends a cemetery. Then, obviously, we have the notepad with” a black spot on it, the black area Mr. Summers had made the night before with the heavy pencil in the coal-company workplace” (213 ). This black spot clearly is a symbol of death, and when it appears on Testis’s piece of paper, she understands she is doomed. All of the villagers, including Testis’s family, stone Testis. Since of this, there needs to be some sort of conflict going on– a male v. Society conflict.
One might quickly say that they are all stoning her even if of tradition, but there has to be more to it than that; one does not simply kill another individual unless the previous is totally lacking a body and soul. This can not be the case, for there were kids involved in the killing” [t] he children had stones currently, and someone gave little Davys Hutchinson a few pebbles” (213 ). Children are not lacking emotion; kids can not be psychopaths. Mrs. Jackson’s readers can presume that there is some conflict going on in this society hat makes them perform this stoning each year; they clearly want somebody to pass away.
This story, as I stated, is extremely appealing. No matter the number of times I read this story, it will always leave me with a puzzled feeling. Why do these people carry Out this ruthless act each year? What began it? Is it Some type of sadistic video game that they’re playing, or do they really genuinely just dislike each other? Concerns like these kept burning the walls of my mind each of the 3 times that I check out “The Lottery.” The reality that even children can eliminate family members– or perhaps anyone at all! Without emotion leaves me with a sensation of bewilderment, for absence of a much better word.
The reality that they all eliminate without feeling has got to make this story’s readers question if we will, one day, blend in with the bulk and accept such a lethal concept. Then, after wondering that, the following question would surely show up: “Have we not currently reached that point?