Hit enter after type your search item

the things they carried analysis

/
/
/
21 Views

the things they brought analysis

IB Language 1A: Analysis of “The Important Things They Carried” Tim O’brien’s depressing but impressive unique “The important things They Brought,” immediately highlights the abrupt death of Ted Lavender. The provision continually draws the reader to witness the concrete weight of the equipment, but the intangible weight is simply as considerable. Depending on each paragraph, the structural development varies tremendously. The variation in sentence length is exceptionally flexible; it assists the reader comprehend the feelings included with war, death and loss.

The structure of the short crisp sentences is invigorating and assists to form the impression that war is an extreme, exhausting experience. “They kicked corpses. They cut off thumbs … They informed stories about Ted Lavender’s supply of tranquilizers … how extremely serene he was.” Although, the list-like details seem unlimited, it really shows how horrible and requiring the war should have been. The passage foundations are jagged and rough, but nevertheless, the structure has been written exactly like the monstrosity of war itself.

O’Brien’s usage of repetition in this passage is really evident. “They smoked the dead guy’s dope … over and over … you can’t alter what can’t be altered.” The regrets and guilt over the death of Ted Lavender are dead weight. O’Brien is constantly restating Ted’s death. This draws the reader’s attention to the scaries of war each time he mentions the misfortune. No emotions are shown, no feelings are pointed out … but repetition does inform the story. The language in the passage changes, giving the writing undertone. They utilized firm vocabulary, to ignore their sensations within. Men eliminated and passed away due to the fact that they were embarrassed not to.” Although it seemed as though the soldiers was difficult, lots of were just too embarrassed to be seen otherwise. When the passage focuses on the concrete weight, O’ Brien composes impersonally, echoing the course of war. Although when discussing personal feeling, the alliterations utilized actually improvise the experience. “Greased they ‘d say. Offed, illuminated, zapped while zipping.” In spite of this, the language is intense and has a colossal understanding, sometimes, providing the reader a very individual experience.

O’ Brien employs a gentler tone, when displaying the feelings for the war victims, “they brought a soldier’s biggest fear, the fear of blushing.” These language strategies show the distinctions and blemishes obvious in the Vietnam War. The storyteller does not pronounce feeling; it is undoubtedly felt by the reader. O’Brien is an omniscient narrator, he writes with no physical feeling, but the psychological feeling imbedded in his story is extraordinary. “They brought outrageous memories. They carried the typical trick of cowardice … in some aspects this was the heaviest burden of all. He/she does not need to check out a word of sadness to feel the horrible softness in the passage, O’Brien’s dazzling writing does this automatically, it seems nearly uncomplicated. Such statements also express emotions in which the other soldiers however would have also felt, guaranteeing the reader is made to ponder on what has actually been composed, and not to depend upon apparent concepts. The use of paradoxes and contrast in the clause very much shocks and surprises the reader. “Grief, fear, love, longing. The tone of this paragraph is informing, yet likewise really dense. The connection between love and terror is extremely asymmetrical and varied; O’Brien is shocking the reader with these different contrasts, tone and structure. Grief can be seen in light, love in darkness, it’s these aspects of the stipulation that challenge the readers theories, the sentences really punctuate and this actually permits the reader to see how O’Brien condemns himself and others. This provision on my account is really requiring. The various tones and aspects of the narrative are really arduous.

The listing of intangible things, really allows you to agree with Tim O’Brien and I admire him immensely for that. Although the death of Ted Lavender has an effect on all the men, they had the strength to forget that humanity grieves, and to move on. The agony of this is practically terrible, but war is an unforgiving environment and I personally think their experiences in Vietnam can trigger them to be invulnerable to sorrow, sadness and worry in such a method that I feel pity for them. If O’Brien was identified to make his readers feel the way he felt on his journey in Vietnam, he very much achieved that.

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar