To Kill a Mockingbird vs a Raisin in the Sun
Harper Lee and Lorraine Hansberry are two extremely different authors, who wrote 2 extremely various works. To Kill a Mockingbird is an unique about how bias and discrimination can lead to an innocent man being founded guilty of a criminal activity he didn’t devote just because of his skin color. A Raisin in the Sun is a play about how the value of a household can conquer racism in a brand-new town and allow a family to prosper, even in the worst conditions. However, both of these works deal with racism and discrimination in comparable methods.
Conversely, Harper Lee, being a white author, can not represent believable accounts of racism and black oppression as well as Lorraine Hansberry, who has individual experience and realism to make her work genuine. The focus of racism in each work differs significantly. In To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee overstresses racism and discrimination. Firstly, she exaggerates prejudice, particularly towards Tom Robinson. The prejudice versus Maycomb’s black neighborhood is just impractical, and Lee seems to be tossing the style of discrimination into the reader’s face. A 3rd defect in To Kill a Mockingbird … is her nostalgic and unbelievable declaration of the Negro issue. Miss Lee is so determined to have her white audience sympathize with Tom Robinson that, instead of making him look like a person, she develops him up into a sort of black-faced Sir Galahad, pure hearted and with a withered right arm. Though the author doubtless did not indicate to suggest this, her real point is that a good Negro … should not be founded guilty of a criminal offense he did not dedicate” (Bloom’s guide 62) Sir Galahad is from Arthurian legends, and is thought to be the knightly embodiment of Jesus.
Building Tom Robinson approximately be “a black-faced Sir Galahad” is making him seem like some sort of idol, but that is not sensible. Another over exaggeration of prejudice in this book is the fact that racism is the primary issue. Without the topic and style of bigotry and prejudice in To Eliminate a Mockingbird, the story would be missing half of the plot. It seems that Lee let other potentially crucial subjects fall aside and focused solely on bigotry. Racism and discrimination were undoubtedly a vital part of the south in the 1930’s, but they were not the only things taking place.
In A Raisin in the Sun, racism is not the most fundamental part of the play, for several reasons. One is that the issues and plot in the play are not race-specific. They could happen in any family black or white. It just so happens that Hansberry chose to make her characters black. “Initially, it is apparent that A Raisin in the Sun is not necessarily a Black play; that is, none of the personality type of the Youngers, none of their objectives, and none of their problems and successes are particularly those of Black people in Chicago of the 1950’s … The] condition of the Youngers is for us “universal,” that is, it represents what we develop to be typical lot of a great lots of “ethnic” groups and celebrates the basic unit of American social structure, the extended family with a dominant and smart parent-figure.” (Contemporary Literary Criticisms Vol 17 page 190) It is not required for the characters in this novel to be black, which removes the need for the main idea of racism. For example, if the Youngers were white, and they were moving into an all black neighborhood, the story would still be possible.
Another factor that racism is not overemphasized is that it is not the only problem in question. A few of the other topics include greed, knowledge, household worths, and the worth of dreams. These other topics appear to overpower the theme of bigotry, making it lesser and not a central idea. For example, Walter’s character experiences a lot of bigotry, in between the people that he works for and the area that the new home is in. However, he encounters a lot more problems with the worth of dreams, like what he wants to make with the cash, and household worths, like when he lastly ends up being a guy.
These other essential styles eclipse the style of bigotry, making it a much lesser concern. The 2 authors have also had much different experiences with racism and bias. Lee has no experience being discriminated agnainst, due to the fact that she is not black. To Kill a Mockingbird is distinguished a white perspective, but Lee attempts to represent ideas of racism in her book. It seems that no matter how well she discusses racial discrimination, she will still just be able to speak through sympathy and not through real experience. The depiction of African Americans of the 1930’s in To Kill a Mockingbird, although conscious the rank injustices they experienced, is nevertheless a view present by a Caucasian who might ‘get in of their skin’ just vicariously, through empathy” There is no other way for Lee to truly understand what it resembled as a black in the 1930’s. Since the majority of her story is based on bigotry versus blacks, her lack of experience makes her story and plot less believable and reasonable. Likewise, the only time Lee approached the black point of view on racism, it was really stereotyped.
Lula was the only person who was black and spoke on white prejudice, and it seems that she was just added as a stereotype of what blacks think of whites. Lee does not understand what blacks think of whites, due to the fact that she is white, so she just completed the missing info with stereotypes. Lee’s absence of experiences with bigotry prevented her ability to blog about bias well. Lorraine Hansberry has experience being black and being victimized, so despite the fact that her play does not focus on bigotry, it still offers the play a more sensible feel.
Readers get the reality experience of being a black individual in this period the great and the bad which may or may not consist of racism. “The supreme virtue of A Raisin in the Sun … is its happy, wondrous proximity to its source, which is life as the dramatist has actually lived it” (Drama For Students, Tynan 196) Likewise, Hansberry showed the white side of racism. She used Mr. Lidner and his viewpoints to show the white side of racism and prejudice. She did her finest to reveal both sides of bigotry in order to not depict her viewpoints as prejudiced. Another difference between the 2 works is the perspective that they are informed in.
Harper Lee told her story in the first individual, through Scout. This caused her viewpoints in her unique to be portrayed as unreasonable and biased. Not only is it in the first individual, but it is likewise distinguished a kid’s point of view. This makes her outlook immature. Scout has actually not been around enough time to actually comprehend the world and its issues, which hurts the unique, as its point is not getting across in addition to it might be. Her accounts of bigotry are flawed due to the fact that it is not complete, as it is told from an undeveloped perspective and from a biased viewpoint.
Lorraine Hansberry tells her story from an objective perspective, which causes her viewpoints and ideas to be illustrated in an objective method. There is no confusion in her plot due to the fact that of somebody’s specific thoughts, since the reader is not inside any of the character’s heads. This gives Hansberry the opportunity to reveal what everyone is feeling, without really knowing their ideas, which makes for a much better account of bigotry and discrimination. This is another reason A Raisin in the Sun represents bigotry and prejudice much better than To Kill a Mockingbird.
To Kill a Mockingbird, a novel focused primarily on racism, and A Raisin in the Sun, a play whose other theme’s overpower the smaller theme of bigotry, are 2 exceptionally different works. It is apparent now that they also approach bias and discrimination in 2 enormously varied manners. One work was written by someone who really experienced bigotry, while the other was composed by an outsider. It is clear that being white hinders Harper Lee’s ability to compose on racism and discrimination as compared to Lorraine Hansberry, who has experience to make her writing more practical and real.